Skip to comments.
Bill Would Require You to Identify Yourself At All Times[TX]
WOAI ^
| 16 Apr 2009
| Jim Forsyth
Posted on 04/20/2009 7:53:50 AM PDT by BGHater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: TexanByBirth
Thank your luck stars; try having a full time one.
21
posted on
04/20/2009 8:20:18 AM PDT
by
ex91B10
To: BGHater
"Currently, it is illegal for a person to give a false name to police, but there is no law
rewiring a person to provide i.d. at an officer's whim."
Well ya can just keep yer hands off my wires. They don't already work too good as it is!
22
posted on
04/20/2009 8:21:15 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Hey Pirates - you got yer asses kicked!)
To: bcsco
And I'm irritated that a (R) is sponsoring it.That's a houtonian (R) which stands for RINO. This is the kind of two faced meallt mouthed con artist that the Republican party must get rid of.
23
posted on
04/20/2009 8:22:35 AM PDT
by
fella
(.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
To: CharlesWayneCT
If they want to know who you are, they can
get a warrant beat you senseless and search you for your ID.
More likely.
24
posted on
04/20/2009 8:22:43 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Saiga 12 shotgun - When the Zombies see it, they'll sh*t bricks.)
To: BGHater
This is a bad idea. It sounds like a misguided attempt to deal with illegals.
25
posted on
04/20/2009 8:22:46 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
(Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
To: CharlesWayneCT
"In this era of national security issues, if we have a police officer detaining someone at a high profile target, it is in the best interests of the safety of that officer and this community to be able to quickly determine who that person is." In other words, "we expect terrorists who may be planning on acts of subversion, sedition and sabotage to be otherwise truthful when confronted by police." In any event, I'm sure that moslems will be exempted before the bill reaches final form.
26
posted on
04/20/2009 8:22:52 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Dallas59
“Inattentive Driving” was the catch-all in NJ for a number of years.
27
posted on
04/20/2009 8:24:52 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: BGHater
... if we have a police officer detaining someone at a high profile target, it is in the best interests of the safety of that officer and this community to be able to quickly determine who that person is." If the police officer doesn't know who the person is that is being detained, how do they know it's a "high profile target"?
28
posted on
04/20/2009 8:28:20 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: DuncanWaring
I'm sure a ‘high-profile target’ could never have forged documents or have access to such material. After all, they are the Jackal. And LEO encounters a merc every day.
29
posted on
04/20/2009 8:30:39 AM PDT
by
BGHater
(Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
To: fella
That's a houtonian(sic)
(R) which stands for RINO.Dan Patrick is a solid Conservative. This is why it is surprising to me that he is sponsoring this bill.
He certainly is no RINO.
30
posted on
04/20/2009 8:34:26 AM PDT
by
Eaker
(The Two Loudest Sounds in the World.....Bang When it should have been Click and the Reverse.)
To: BGHater
In this era of national security issues, if we have a police officer detaining someone at a high profile targetIf that is the reasoning, write it into the bill.
31
posted on
04/20/2009 8:38:08 AM PDT
by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: agere_contra
This bill should pass, but should only be applied to the current inhabitant of the White House. Which one, Barrack Hussein Obama or Barry Sorento?
32
posted on
04/20/2009 8:44:24 AM PDT
by
Retired COB
(Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
To: BGHater
The bill is sponsored by State Sen. Dan Patrick (R-Houston), who is a strong supporter of individual rights. This guy needs to sit down and STHU!
You can't be for individual rights and then fly in the face of the 4th AND 5th Amendments.
You don't loose your right to be 'secure in your papers' just because you leave the house, and you can't be forced to provide evidence that can be used against you.....PERIOD!
Not to mention that anyone determined to do any harm will have false identification, ANYWAY.
GEESH! What bizzarro world rock did this guy crawl out from under?
33
posted on
04/20/2009 8:44:36 AM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(If you WOULDN'T work for free for your employer, why would you do it for the government?)
To: Dallas59
"Why were you looking at me like you were scared?" "You look like you might be an illegal."
34
posted on
04/20/2009 8:45:48 AM PDT
by
Retired COB
(Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
To: mysterio
We live in one of the most legislated societies on the planet. We have enforced thought control.
To: MeekOneGOP; bamahead
36
posted on
04/20/2009 8:50:45 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
To: fella
That's a houtonian (R) which stands for RINO. This is the kind of two faced meallt mouthed con artist that the Republican party must get rid of.No argument there...
37
posted on
04/20/2009 8:53:34 AM PDT
by
bcsco
(I'm a Constitution defender!)
To: BGHater
which would require citizens to show some sort of identification to any police officer who demands itI do believe I just found a loophole... This law ONLY applies to those who are legally in the USA...
38
posted on
04/20/2009 8:58:23 AM PDT
by
John123
(The US may be going down the drain, but everyone else will drown first...)
To: BGHater
Everybody had enough yet?
No?
Niemoller’s Long Fuse burns on.
To: Eaker
He certainly is no RINO. The fact that he is behind this attack on our freedom makes him a RINO.
By the way tomorrow we in Texas will celebrate the over throw of the dictator Santa Anna.
And yesterday was the anniversary of the battles of Lexington and Concord the beginning of the end of royal tyranny.
40
posted on
04/20/2009 9:01:29 AM PDT
by
fella
(.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson