Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I.F. Stone, Soviet Agent—Case Closed
Commentary Magazine ^ | April 21, 2009 | Harvey Klehr, John E. Haynes and Alexander Vassiliev

Posted on 04/21/2009 11:15:37 AM PDT by Jbny

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: rlmorel

Miss Coulter’s “Treason” should be mandatory reading in all American history classes IMHO.

Considering how liberal a Republican administration the Nixon Administration really was(Nixon going to China, seeking detente with the former U.S.S.R., institution of wage and price controls, creation of the EPA, appointment of Supreme Court justices who, except for Rehnquist, were pro-abortion), one would think Nixon would be thought of much more highly by the Left. But the crazies never forgave him for nailing Hiss(possibly Nixon’s greatest accomplishment).


61 posted on 04/21/2009 8:24:42 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

An honest politician has the chance of snowball surviving in Hell in Chicago. There may be individuals but the Daley Machine and Timuel Black/Palmer/Obama/Axelrod/Rose leftist coalitions are too strong to overcome. Perhaps with the death of the old leftists but Obama has brought in the new Communist mafiosos of the SDS/Weathermen, Ayers, Katz, etc.

Labor has always been a target of both the Reds and the Mafia. In fact, Sidney Lens used to brag about his physically fighting off and beating the mafia in the streets while he was a communist with the Revolutionary Workers League.

Check him out. You’ll find one of the best communist organizers in the movement’s history. I’ve seen him in action. He used to write for “The Progressive” and “The Nation”. Was one of the powers behind the Vietnam Mobilization Committees, of which I was a cofounder (New Mobe).

Sid impressed me, both for his skills and for his being one of the greatest threats to American security.


62 posted on 04/21/2009 8:44:15 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

I read it...GREAT book!


63 posted on 04/21/2009 8:52:20 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
But until I read “Witness”, I did not understand the real threat the liberalism posed to our country. Once I read that book, my tolerance for liberalism as a valid opposing point of view vanished completely.

Wow, great developmental reflections - thank you very much for sharing all of that. I've experienced much of your journey myself, and experienced the same sort of puzzlement as I discovered the various petals of truth that were in such complete, diametrical opposition to the earnest teachings I had received for so long from various liberal sources. And like you, I finally reached a moment of epiphany where I realized the completely vile evil that liberalism actually represents, despite it's incredibly facile and numerous levels of lies about truth, light, peace, harmony and absolutely every other good thing known to the human race.

64 posted on 04/22/2009 12:35:53 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jbny


"Progressive" has always been a code work for Commie

OTHER INFAMOUS SELF-DESCRIBED "PROGRESSIVES"

JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG

CONVICTED & EXECUTED AS SOVIET SPIES


65 posted on 04/22/2009 12:47:51 AM PDT by Cincinna (TIME TO REBUILD * PALIN * JINDAL * CANTOR 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

If you are going to quote the great Poets, please get the quote right.

“Oh! what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!”

Sir Walter Scott, (1771 - 1832)

Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.


66 posted on 04/22/2009 12:52:51 AM PDT by Cincinna (TIME TO REBUILD * PALIN * JINDAL * CANTOR 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

On that last, any time I have had insider information on a news story, the media got something important wrong, often several somethings, and hugely so.

I now assume this is the case on just about every story I read, especially on politically oriented stories.


67 posted on 04/22/2009 2:42:24 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Obama: Carter's only chance to avoid going down in history as the worst U.S. president ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jbny
Eric Alterman, a onetime Stone protégé, called the Stone-KGB stories “smears,” “phony,” and “pathetic,” dismissing the whole contretemps as “an almost entirely bogus controversy over whether Stone ever willingly spied for the Russians or cooperated with the KGB in any way. He did not.” KGB archival documents tell a different story.

Well whaddya know? That twit is probably a fellow traveler and a red diaper baby just like Axelrod.

68 posted on 04/22/2009 3:32:58 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Obama really did believe that stuff he was saying during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
Ineresting ~ back during the immediate pre-WWII period government labor organizations (e.g. Mailhandlers, NALC, APWU, etc.) made tremendous headway in gaining government recognition through the simple expedient of engaging in street battles AGAINST Communist labor organizers.

They'd travel around to Cleveland, Cincy, Indianapolis, Baltimore, New York, Miami, St. Louis and so forth and literally fight these guys ~ beat them up ~ drive them away.

Roosevelt made sure they were given authority to talk to members of Congress, something that'd been off-limits for federal government employees since the Pendleton Act.

I know that doesn't sound like Roosevelt (since around here we all officially believe him to have been a mind-numbed Leftwingtard robot), but he did have his interests where the domestic Commies didn't quite fit in.

So, where do you find the materials on that (you might ask) ~ well, in the newsletter/magazine produced by the United States Postal Inspection Service over the last Century+. They covered all this stuff because management would send them out to "watch" and report back. I had a chance to read through all the old stuff right up to the mid 1980s in the USPS Headquarters library. Somebody'd declassified all the "newsletters" and put them on the shelves.

Fantastic stuff, and at the time I don't believe any professional writers knew about them.

Remember, in that earlier period of our history the Inspectors were more prominant than today and had more resources than the other federal investigative bodies. As a result they ended up in every shootout and got to follow the Commies around.

I never focused on the Chicago stuff, but there's a lot of it in there as I recall.

If you get into looking at any postal related materials keep your eye on the family name "Young". As you recall a guy named Coleman Young was elected Mayor of Detroit in 1974. Later on it was revealed he was a paid agent of the CPUSA (et al).

That's not terribly important. His younger brother was the personnel director at the Post Office. That's not terribly important either.

What is important is that once KGB or GRU defectors had been "used up" after being thoroughly debriefed, if they didn't have some serious professional education they were simply sent over to the Detroit post office to work in a craft job (carrier, clerk, etc.).

Obviously the CPUSA had "coin of the realm" in the world of Commie intraparty intrigue ~ they knew where the defectors were, which ones had been neutralized, and what they were doing.

I don't believe Chicago had any defectors but if they had the Commies would have gotten someone into USPS management who could get back to them with such information.

So, how did the Young brothers get such an important position in Commie circles?

Damned if I know!

69 posted on 04/22/2009 5:24:20 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
Wasn't the Chicago Mafia, or the Outfit, different in some respects from their East Coast counterpart, centered around the Five Families in New York that were memorialized in The Godfather movies? The Chicago Mafia was not exclusively Sicilian or even Italian, and there were “made men” who were of Irish, Jewish, British, Polish, etc., ancestry. Also, on the East Coast, the Mafia's interest in labor unions, such as the Teamsters and the Longshoremen, were in direct conflict with the Commies. These unions were strongly anti-Communist, as was the American Federation of Labor generally. The tension between the gangsters and the Reds in the East does not seem to have been the case in Chicago or Detroit.
70 posted on 04/22/2009 5:56:34 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Same thing. Just a different way of saying it.

Clinton complained about the “politics of personal destruction.” It didn’t really happen to him. But it did happen to Joseph McCarthy.


71 posted on 04/22/2009 8:16:50 AM PDT by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress. What is it today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Communist sympathizers within our government also led to his downfall. They accused him of “faking” photos and baited Roy Cohn by asking him what he knows of “fairies”.


72 posted on 04/22/2009 8:21:43 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

“charming, smiling, and full of communist propaganda.”

He sounds like an older version of Obama;)


73 posted on 04/22/2009 9:30:46 AM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

“I think the best way to describe Joe McCarthy is...

Right message, wrong messenger.”

Agreed. If only he had looked more like JFK instead of like a guy who breaks kneecaps for a living, he would have had a far more receptive audience...


74 posted on 04/22/2009 9:35:10 AM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

What a stupid statement.


75 posted on 04/22/2009 9:36:53 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
On a C-SPAN panel marking the anniversary of Watergate, an audience member asked the panel: "If you subtract Watergate from Nixon's presidency, couldn't he be considered a pretty good president?"

I thought Carl Bernstein's head was going to explode. He practically jumped out pf his chair and started screaming that Watergate could never be subtracted from Nixon! It was who the man was...and on and on he fumed. Boy, talk about being invested in something. Neither Woodward or Bernstein were about to let go of the greatest achievement in their lives.

When Katherine Graham was on Larry King's show flacking her book, she actually admitted the Washington Post went after Nixon to bring him down and destroy him and she used Woodward and Bernstein (both cub reporters for the Metro section), because if anything went wrong and the story blew up in their faces, she could blame the over-exuberance of a couple of kids. Incredible.

76 posted on 04/22/2009 9:58:51 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

But writers from “The Nation,” the country’s oldest avowedly Marxist rag, still appear on cable TV as if they were not part of the communist movement since the 1800’s.


77 posted on 04/22/2009 10:04:04 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drpix

“This faction was in fact pro-Stalin and included the mother of the man behind Obama, fellow red-diaper baby, David Axelrod.”

Got a link?!!


78 posted on 04/22/2009 10:17:04 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

Some day the dinosaur will die. Then we’ll have to kill all the bad ideas it inspired, starting with government education.


79 posted on 04/22/2009 10:21:47 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Jbny

placemarker*


80 posted on 04/22/2009 12:56:33 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson