Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Charles Darwin’s footsteps (new movie designed to bring creation message to secular audience)
CMI ^ | April 22, 2009 | Carl Wieland

Posted on 04/22/2009 9:28:26 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: steve-b
A missing link between what and what? Small and large T.rex?

Like a cougar is a missing link between house cats and tigers because after all their skulls are similar.

41 posted on 04/22/2009 11:01:40 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stormer
Tell us some of the things you love most about Allmendream.

And please be more specific than your usual, “I just want him.”

42 posted on 04/22/2009 11:19:21 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Your reductio fails because your stated proposition is wrong,
“the typical creationist argument that if one accepts the theory of evolution then one necessarily has an animosity towards the God of the Bible”

Having followed these threads, I know that even if some creationists have made such an argument its not “typical”.

The only person who said anything about the Pope hating the Bible is YOU.

“So you agree with the premise that the Pope hates the Bible?
Or do you agree that it is a ridiculous strawman?”

You've no room to talk about a “strawman”!

43 posted on 04/22/2009 11:41:51 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The only reason why Evolution has survived till now is precisely because of the very political muscle you decry

You forget that Evolution grew to be the dominant theory on the evidence and argument, despite shouts of heresy against its proponents, despite criminal prosecution by the creationists.

On the contrary, ID is not being supressed, regardless of the lies in recent movies. ID is simply being appropriately dismissed as non-scientific. Creationism is also appropriately dismissed as being non-scientific. Creationism is religious by definition, and the originators of ID admit it is a religious movement with religious goals.

I agree you should be free to teach ID and creationism in public schools and universities, but in philosophy, sociology or religion class, not in science class.

44 posted on 04/22/2009 11:43:18 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Yawn.


45 posted on 04/22/2009 11:57:25 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

You must have this movie mistaken for one that peddle’s Darwood’s fanciful creation myth.


46 posted on 04/22/2009 12:06:11 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I do believe you mean “peddles”, not “peddle’s”...and I have no idea who Darwood is.

Bye now!


47 posted on 04/22/2009 12:08:27 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Watch that door now!


48 posted on 04/22/2009 12:18:39 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

:)


49 posted on 04/22/2009 12:19:29 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: edweena
If you can show them how intelligent design is holding them back from advancing their understanding of their discipline, they will be happy to adopt a new frame.

I admire your naivete, I really do.

50 posted on 04/22/2009 12:23:48 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cedric; stormer; allmendream
Tell us some of the things you love most about Allmendream. And please be more specific than your usual, “I just want him.”

I think that stormer was only trying to point out that allmendream is working in the field of biology. Whether you agree with him or not allmendream actually speaks with intelligence and coming from a solid background in the field. That you can’t speak to the topic and having run out of arguments, had to bring it down to a gay slur is typical for a 12 year old playground bully.

BTW – isn’t there some Commandment about bearing false witness? Have you not just broken it?
51 posted on 04/22/2009 12:42:14 PM PDT by Caramelgal (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I have quotes from scientist after scientist (you know, the ones with actual PhDs) admitting that evolution is superfluous to productive science.

..and I know several former Christians who became atheists and many who have just left the church because they where disillusioned by the kindergarten level antics and logic of those who insisted on pushing the young earth theories. Maybe young earth styled creationists are right, but if they are going to go after evolutionists, IDrs, or theistic evolutionists because of 'gaps' of knowledge, they probably should fill their own gaps first. Just like our knowledge of Newtonian Gravity theory has long since evolved past Newton's original theories and we still have major gaps in our knowledge, doesn't mean that gravity doesn't exist. Setting this war up is driving people away from the church, something I wouldn't be surprised is designed. I know I wouldn't send my kids to the religious private schools I attended when I walk in and see pictures of dinosaurs on the ark and such and consider Kent Hovind a real scientist(in high school classes).

52 posted on 04/22/2009 12:44:25 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Perhaps if you read the article at the top of this thread you might have stumbled across this passage...

“evolution-based complacency and hostility toward the God of the Bible.”

This is the standard Creationist canard. If one accepts the theory of evolution, then according to this logical construction, one must have hostility towards the God of the Bible.

Acceptance of evolution is directly equated with hostility towards God.

Thus a “reductio ad absurdum” argument would be that because the Pope accepts the theory of evolution the Pope has hostility towards the God of the Bible.

Obviously this is an idiotic and absurd premise, yet the logical reduction of this idiotic and absurd creationist axiom.

And this argument is typical creationist fare here on FR. They have little else to base their argument on.

53 posted on 04/22/2009 12:45:52 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal

The fact that you so vehemently and irrationally object to my well-founded conclusion, based upon a scientific, non-biological, examination of the evidence freely offered by stormer, himself, says more about you than it does about me.


54 posted on 04/22/2009 12:50:38 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I don’t believe you.


55 posted on 04/22/2009 12:52:17 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

That’s fine, you are free to believe or not believe what you want.. your belief doesn’t effect the truth of the statement.


56 posted on 04/22/2009 12:54:59 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Your tricky Pope trap isn’t fooling anyone but it is making someone look like a fool.


57 posted on 04/22/2009 12:55:38 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Actually, I do believe the anti-Christian bigotry part.
58 posted on 04/22/2009 12:57:21 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

It isn’t tricky and it isn’t a trap.

It is simply reducing to the absurd the typical Creationist canard that acceptance of the theory of evolution directly equates to hostility towards “the God of the Bible”.

The Pope accepts the theory of evolution, does it follow that the Pope has hostility towards “the God of the Bible”?

(BTW, I ABHORE that construction. God is the God of all Creation, not the “God of the Bible”. But as long as Creationists are intent on worshiping a book rather than God, I guess they may as well call it like they see it.)


59 posted on 04/22/2009 12:58:48 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
What anti-Christian bigotry? I am a Christian, I just don't believe the current young-earth creation meme, I fall under the theistic evolution school of thought. I generally find that most of the bigotry against Christians internally comes from those who demand a strict orthodox belief in items God Himself doesn't list as a requirement to be a Christian. I.E. If you don't believe XX means exactly what I say it does, you aren't a true Christian... That's between me and God. That attitude, however, drives people from the Church. People try to make a scientific text out of a theological text. Why believe in gravity, it isn't in the Bible? Why believe in hydrodynamics, it isn't in the Bible? Why believe in radioactivity, it isn't in the Bible?
60 posted on 04/22/2009 1:04:32 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson