Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Danger Of An Israeli Strike On Iran
YAHOO! ^ | April 24, 2009 | By Walt Rodgers

Posted on 04/25/2009 3:18:27 AM PDT by Fennie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons - or we will. Benjamin Netanyahu's challenge smacks of unrealistic bravado and, worse, it appears to be a crude attempt to bully an American President into bombing Iran's nuclear installations. The consequences of a unilateral Israeli strike would be enormous if not disastrous. Mr. Obama cannot allow himself to be intimidated by Mr. Netanyahu, nor can he wink if the Israeli air force bombs Iran's nuclear facilities.

41 posted on 04/25/2009 5:50:57 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
Can you say oil $250.00 bbl?

IF Iran succeeded in closing the Straits of Hormuz it would only be with the collusion and cooperation of the US President. Not saying he won't do it either. An economic oil "crisis" might fit his plans just right.

42 posted on 04/25/2009 5:54:34 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons - or we will. Benjamin Netanyahu's challenge smacks of unrealistic bravado and, worse, it appears to be a crude attempt to bully an American President into bombing Iran's nuclear installations.

Two points: 1. Since Israel has done it before, there is no "unrealistic bravado" involved. 2. When Israel has the capability of rendering every capital city of the surrounding anti-Israel nations into steaming plains of fused glass why would it try to "bully" a pro-Muslim, anti-American president into doing something it is perfectly capable of doing itself?
43 posted on 04/25/2009 5:55:54 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: djf

There’s already an agreement with the oil producing states (Saudi, Kuwait, et al) that oil prices and production would remain stable if/when Iran is targeted. Don’t you think these economies would enjoy removing a wildcard such as Iran (Shia bastion)?


44 posted on 04/25/2009 5:58:58 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner; Quiller
Do it anyway? Let alone the fact that an attack on Iran would be an official act of war against a “peacefull” nation under international law (so Iran would have every right to retaliate in any form they want).

"Iran would have every right ....."?

How quaint.

"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." ..... Thucydides, The Peloponnesian War, The Melian Dialogue (Book 5, Chapter 17)

Operation Opera 1981(Destroying Saddam's Nuclear Reactor)

Destroying Syria's Nuclear Reactor, 2007

It would be suicide to attack Iran without US help.

It would not be "suicide". Maybe "ineffectual without the active involvement of U.S. air power" due to the logistics involved and the hardened and dispersed nature of the Iranian target set but not "suicide".

45 posted on 04/25/2009 6:08:21 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
I don't think the Israelis will try to overfly Iraq on a direct route to Iran without U.S. permission and I don't believe Obama will ever give them permission. I'm betting they will fly over Syria to the Iraq-Turkey border and fly along that border at very low altitude to Iran. Look at the map.


46 posted on 04/25/2009 6:09:08 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

As we can tell which side you are on and that you are rooting for the OBAMBI not allowing isreal to protect itself, you apparently dont realize the nuke stockpile in isreal is probably as much as france, they just dont brag about it and will use the force needed to destroy iran and friends if no one else helps stop the musi satan states from having nukes to use at the whim of a mullah.


47 posted on 04/25/2009 6:10:31 AM PDT by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All

The danger is that they miss.


48 posted on 04/25/2009 6:19:16 AM PDT by rbmillerjr ("We Are All Socialists Now"........not me, not now, not ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fennie; LucyT
The consequences of a unilateral Israeli strike would be enormous if not disastrous. Mr. Obama cannot allow himself to be intimidated by Mr. Netanyahu, nor can he wink if the Israeli air force bombs Iran's nuclear facilities.

Obama doesn't give a flying f**k about Israel. He's already sold them out. The most disasterous thing that can happen is Iran building a nuke and obliterating Israel. For those who think that Iran would not do it, they need to study up on the Messianic rantings of a madman, namely Ahmedinejad, who believes that destrying Israel would usher the arrival of the 12th Imam.

Everybody said the same thing about Saddam Hussein's nuclear reactor who also was building a nuke and would not have hesitated to use it on Israel. Israel knocked it out in 1981, and the Arab countries, were cheering Israel privately while condeming them publicly. If it were not for Israel bombing of Saddam's nuclear reactor, he would have developed nukes and made ending the invasion and occupation of Kuwait impossible for coalition forces to do anything.

In caase you missed the memo, we've got a Muslim in the White House who has gone out of his way to suck up to Muslim and Arab countries while giving the finger to the only true Democracy and American ally in the Middle East.

Since Obama lacks the stones to do anything about it, just like Europe is doing, the responsibility for the safety of Israel rests solely with Israel.

49 posted on 04/25/2009 6:24:07 AM PDT by Polarik (Forgeries are forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdfromlv

As we can tell which side you are on and that you are rooting for the OBAMBI not allowing isreal to protect itself, you apparently dont realize the nuke stockpile in isreal is probably as much as france, they just dont brag about it and will use the force needed to destroy iran and friends if no one else helps stop the musi satan states from having nukes to use at the whim of a mullah.


first where in my posts have i picked a side or have rooted for Obama? I was only pointing out my personal impression about the difficults Israel may face. (if you would ask me in personal i would say i´m european so what ever Israel may does or not, doesn´t realy affect me in any way at all so there is no need to pick a special side). and Yes i´m aware of the fact that Israel has nuclear weapons. but to think that Israel could use them on a country like Iran without getting attacket first and get away with it belongs in a world of Fantasy.


50 posted on 04/25/2009 6:28:04 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

“And exactly what would be the consequences of an Iranian strike on Israel???.....”
__________________________________________________________

Or what would be the consequences of Iran proliferating its nuclear weapons to terrorists groups who would use them against the US and Europe (i.e.: NYC, LA, London, etc.)??

It seems that this current administration is hell bent on pushing its domestic agenda while ignoring the international threats. Furthermore, they are trying to demonize past efforts to protect ourselves by prosecuting those who did protect us.


51 posted on 04/25/2009 6:28:49 AM PDT by TMA62 (TMA62)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Amen to that. I hope Netanyahu shows more resolve than he did last time he had that job.


52 posted on 04/25/2009 6:29:42 AM PDT by arthurus (ACORN + Amnesty = Venezuelan Democracy in the USSSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Any nation has the right to act in its own perceived national interest. Obviously, I don’t know, but I will give you odds, that shortly after Iran has an operational nuclear weapon and a means, however poor, to deliver it, they will strike at Israel. One bomb getting through would have terrible consequences.


53 posted on 04/25/2009 6:32:33 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (Sun Tzu "The Art of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DrC

I have NO fear but faith that GOD is on ISRAEL’s side, and will totally destroy her enemies completely!! God is in control!!!


54 posted on 04/25/2009 6:34:41 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Knowing how Israel has tried to save innocent lives, they will give the Iranian people plenty of time to escape from the future parking lot!

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!!!


55 posted on 04/25/2009 6:36:02 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Israel???? “Miss”?!?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Perhaps you don’t understand that this is a nation in danger of COMPLETE GENOCIDE.

Bibi won’t “miss”, you can make book on that.


56 posted on 04/25/2009 6:40:28 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

“Iran would have every right .....”?


my point was (it would be backed by international law while Israel would violate it). if they would/should care is another point but....

It would not be “suicide”. Maybe “ineffectual without the active involvement of U.S. air power” due to the logistics involved and the hardened and dispersed nature of the Iranian target set but not “suicide”.


Hey english is not my mother tounge ;-) mabey i should have used ineffective (or that the final result may not be “worth” the casulties) ... i didn´t mean “suicide” in a form that this will result in the total destruction of Israel. Sorry for that.


57 posted on 04/25/2009 6:41:15 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Quite right. Right now this is political posturing, a reminder of the value of the alliance, a disagreement between equals (in the sense that the US doesn’t philosophically have client states in the way that the USSR/Russia had/has); the Obama plan however will be to deploy US troops as “peacekeepers” in Gaza and the so-called West Bank, such that Israel will withdraw to 1967 borders (give or take) and hand over temporary control to US troops.

Short of a house-to-house reduction of hostiles such as US forces did in, say, Fallujah, there’s no way for such an arrangement to work. IMHO, the ethnically undifferentiated Arabs squatting on Jewish lands should be given the opportunity to move — and not to the US as Obama is trying to do — into ample lands with water supplies and no PLO/PA/Hamas/Fatah ruining their lives.


58 posted on 04/25/2009 6:41:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
"Walter Rodgers, a former senior international correspondent for CNN"

In other words, this ignorant chicken sh*t doesn't have a clue.

I'll trust Bibi Netanyahu's judgment long before I'll trust that wuckphit Rodgers to tell me what the current time and temperature is outside.
59 posted on 04/25/2009 6:42:12 AM PDT by mkjessup (You're either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner
(if you would ask me in personal i would say i´m european so what ever Israel may does or not, doesn´t realy affect me in any way at all so there is no need to pick a special side).

This is a sick joke!

Europe has centuries of Jewish blood fertilizing its evil soil and Europeans would not be upset by Jews not going to Cossack swords or gas chambers peacefully?

Tell me another.

60 posted on 04/25/2009 6:52:11 AM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson