Posted on 04/27/2009 8:06:08 AM PDT by Nachum
The Obama administration declared a public health emergency Sunday to confront the swine flu but is heading into its first medical outbreak without a secretary of Health and Human Services or appointees in any of the departments 19 key posts.
President Barack Obama has not yet chosen a surgeon general or the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. His choice to run the Food and Drug Administration awaits confirmation
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Sure looks to me like he’s putting security and intell people in control of our health agencies.
Let me know if you want on or off the ping list.
Posts this morning so far to the website:
Reid says Obama told him, 'I have a gift'
The Obama administration is heading into its first medical outbreak without a secretary of Health and Human Services or appointees in any of the departments 19 key posts
Obama says that the threat of spreading swine flu infections is a cause for concern but "not a cause for alarm"
In a way I’m glad there is no HHS Secretary, no Surgeon General, and no head of the CDC. I’d rather the professionals be handling this without interference from appointees who’s sole job is to make Obama look good.
The US has the best medical care in the world. Of course, due to a lot of redtape and bureaucracy, we do have a bit of a shortage for doctors and nurses. But Obama isn't interested in medical care, so there will be no fixes here.
Health care is all about insurance, and paperwork, and bureaucracy, and redtape. And most important of all -- it's about Control. This is where Obama wants to focus. He wants more of everything. And putting security and intel people in charge will suit him nicely. Health care is where the action is.
Couldn’t they say Public awareness advisory!! Instead of state of emergency..
The US has the best medical care in the world. Of course...
If you want to identify a country with a more competent medical establishment than the US, please be my guest ...
same could be said the other way around. btw. i do not think that the US has advanced medical procedures nobody else has. it´s true most of the world has not, but if we talk about western first world countries i cannot see why the US would be so special? i have never said (i really don´t know the “i guess no one knows this” exact status of every single countries medical standart in this world. but money can buy you everything what ever is available on global technology. shure it will be possible (if you have the money) to get the worlds best specialist in a certain medical sector. but if this specialist lives in the US, Japan, Swiss.... is pure luck and depends on the current medical problem. i´m not saying that the US medical care is bad or that there are countries out there which have better technologies in generall (as i said money will buy you everything so it depends just on the spending). but i can not see why the US should be so special or even have a higher standart than other rich first world countries.
I’m remembering Rahm Emmanuel’s comment about never letting a “crisis” go to waste.
Let us count the ways this particular “emergency” could be used toward gov’t control of “health care”.
I would identify the UK as a very advanced western country. Due to the NHS in the UK, people over there have died in emergency room waiting areas, because no one saw them, even after a 24 hr wait. Medical care is rationed in the UK. People pull their teeth out with pliers because the wait for a dentist is so long.
That's what happens with a "free" medical system. Rich people in the UK can get much better medical care -- because they can hop on a plane and come to the US. Our medical care is not free and that's why the quality is likely to be better. This is not a matter of luck, as you seem to imply. Highly competent medical professionals from around the world come to the US to practice -- because the money is good. The money earned by doctors in the UK is not nearly go good. So the quality of doctors in the UK is also not nearly so good.
This is basic stuff for anyone who understands free markets. Obama does not understand free markets -- which is why he is trying to make the US a lot more like the UK.
I would identify the UK as a very advanced western country...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.