Posted on 04/30/2009 5:03:39 PM PDT by GVnana
I just had to have it!
Someone could make a small fortune putting the Obama symbol in the middle of targets and selling them at a firing range. (They’d have to make their money pretty quick, though, before the men in black suits showed up.) :o)
Some ranges frown on targets that have images of people. However, I think that any number of Obama round seals and images would make perfect bullseye stickers, especially on otherwise black targets.
Must see.
Yeah we ought to stick to the Zero’s symbol instead of a picture. When Klintonev was occupying the White House, the secret service was pretty aggressive. During Bush’s two terms, you could not get a reaction out of them. However, I would tread very lightly with this sort of thing with this vindictive kid in the White House. Especially is you are not a bedwetting liberal.
The range we go to has both an Obama target and a “bad guy holding a hostage” target.
I got one of those god awful stickers that moveon.org was giving away after the Messiah won the election. I got for one and only one purpose.....
The image link says “Picoodle”, but when I clicked on it, I got “image not posted”, and then the link attempted to open a bunch of windows. Check it out—what’s up with that?
I don't know. It was there when I posted. Maybe someone complained and Picoodle deleted the picture. Maybe. I would not be surprised.
The image was of the moveon.org sticker with several bullet holes in it.
But for the cost, the commemorative plates would have been a real hit on the skeet range.
Hey! It’s one way to stimulate the economy!
Boy, Zero’s stimulus’ plan did in fact work for us- even before he was named PresentOTUS. Not a single firearm company asked for some bailout money.
WOW!!!!!!!!
Funny, but sadly true. Buying them early may not help, though, if the ban is retroactive, as tax and gun control laws so often are. NOTE: The 2nd Amendment is SELF-incorporated to all government entities at every level. It is MORE ABSOLUTE than the 1st Amendment, or any of the others, because the wording forbids not only CONGRESS, but ANYONE from infringing on it. The 1st says “Congress shall make no law...”. The 2nd say “shall NOT be infringed!” Period! End of debate!
ROFL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.