Unlike Romney's "National Council for a New America," Free Republic is a conservative site!

Refer to Romney's Council for a New American Socialist State formed in HIS Image ^ | May 2, 2009 | Jim Robinson

[Zevonismymuse]

If there is anyone here who doesn't understand why we cannot support a slick socialist politician like Mitt Romney, God help you, but you're on the wrong website.

I have been concerned about the rude treatment I have received on Romney threads and even wrote you directly to complain when I sent in my last donation. I wish you would have refused my donation and told me I was not welcome here then.

[snowrip]

Um...I really don't care about you or your tag line and the fact that you need to call the usual Mormon-hating loon patrol, is kinda proof that there really is something seriously wrong with you.
Lighten up, Francis. Shooting down a candidate's political record while being an ex-Mormon hardly qualifies someone as a "Mormon-hater".

For the record, I'm agnostic, so I really have no dog in any argument over religion. Frankly, the relationship between religion and politics is a noose which hangs conservatives every time. The framers realized that a belief in God drove their personal value systems, not their voting demographics, and created a government that was based on the rights of mankind (granted by God) rather than man's position on religion. It's a fine line, but religious views have no place in the governance of a nation, or any other system which involves linear thinking in the arena of rational thought.

[ansel12]

A blatant lie will permanently ruin a reputation.

[ansel12]

Meaning your reputations, spreading lies about Governor Palin will only damage your Romney agenda even more.

[Brad’s Gramma]

https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/pledge

[mnehring]

I sometimes get the impression that Freerepublic is Republican before conservative.

Probably because we just came out of the general election season, in which you have to deal with the crap you are handed, either McBama or O'Bambi. Both sucked, but one sucked a little bit less. As Winston Churchill said: In war as in life, it is often necessary when some cherished scheme has failed, to take up the best alternative open, and if so, it is folly not to work for it with all your might.

[campaignPete R-CT]

Romney is “someone we cannot support”. And, yet, similar “someones” keep getting nominated by the GOP for President. Often with considerable conservative support. This is likely to happen in ‘12, unless sufficient numbers decide that it cannot be permitted again.

“We cannot afford to lose again!” - Mario Cuomo 1992, or was it ‘88?

Regarding Collins & Snowe: credible conservative candidates have frequently run for high office in Maine. For example, the southern Maine congressional district. They often receive limited support from the grassroots and rely on party insiders for the base of their campaign.

When the day comes that this changes, the ‘vacuum’ will no longer exist and there will no longer be candidates like Collins & Snowe nominated. The 2 ladies are largely a symptom of, and end result of, conservative indifference.

[ridge]

Absolutely agree. The site is perfect for James von Brunn. This thread has been pulled.
Pulled on 06/10/2009 12:14:03 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

No thanks

Okay

[SuperLuminal]

"We went through this with the abortionist, gay rights activist, illegal alien supporting, gun grabbing Rudy Giuliani until someone created another website call WAnkers for Rudy and they all flew the coop. Hopefully, before too much FReeper blood is shed, someone will create a WAnkers for Romney site and we can be left to fight the good fight as we see fit! "

I love disguised subtlety! {:-)