Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

A few years ago, it was “Barack who”, so your premise falls flat. Those who refuse to learn from the past are just intellectually lazy and will accept who ever the media annoints as our “acceptable” candidate due to “electability” or what ever other media-created kool-aid the public will swallow.

Those who insist on a Governorship before a nomination also didn’t vote for the only governors in the race, FLIP Romney and Huckleberry from Hope.

We’ll end up with another “maverick” RINO if that’s what we allow to be the method for choosing the RIGHT candidate.


212 posted on 05/03/2009 2:01:08 PM PDT by RasterMaster (DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: RasterMaster

In fact outside of California it would have been “Ronald who” until the middle of the Carter term.


217 posted on 05/03/2009 2:04:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

To: RasterMaster
A few years ago, it was “Barack who”, so your premise falls flat

ridiculous. 5 years ago he was the key note speaker at the DNC...the year Bush beat Kerry.

O’Bummer was the DNC’s ‘fair haired’ Marxist boy...and he was all anyone heard about for the next four years (thanks to the MSM, George Soros and Acorn)....so your premise falls flat.

284 posted on 05/03/2009 2:30:38 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson