To: gimme1ibertee; ExGeeEye; euram; william clark; Clyde5445; brushcop; JApost; bray; curth; ...
Palin PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
...
Of course the RINOs prefer to ignore Palin. Because they fear her and the tide that will flush them out.
82 posted on
05/04/2009 12:06:53 AM PDT by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to becomes slaves of Washington.")
To: SolidWood
They are going to do everything they can to defeat her in 2010. They have given up the fight against Obama, at least for the moment. If he stumbles badky, of course, they will turn their attention in that direction, of course.
84 posted on
05/04/2009 12:21:07 AM PDT by
RobbyS
(ECCE homo)
To: SolidWood
I thought that for someone as talented with his verbal skills as Romney is, he should NOT have spoken so flippantly about THE REAL DEAL & RUSH. When will they EVER get it??? (answer: I wonder if EVER)
(and I'm a Romney fan, who LOVES PALIN and who thought a Romney/Palin ticket would be a great way to get Palin in there for those still a bit unsure of her "Presidentiality" factor)
100 posted on
05/04/2009 6:59:55 AM PDT by
NordP
(CONSERVATIVE AGAIN IN 2010 ..... Now, is it 2012 yet ???)
To: SolidWood
I’d rather stand with Sarah than any of the ‘posers’...she’s the real-deal in my opinion.
111 posted on
05/04/2009 10:28:19 AM PDT by
FlashBack
('0'bama: "Katrina on a Global Level")
To: SolidWood
Have you noticed that Sarah doesn’t make fun of any of these windbags? It’s they who gratuitously put her down. I wonder why.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson