[org.whodat]

They were numerous cases of stupid individuals thinking the law applied to them. And they were claiming access across deeded property. The state has given up, after peeing away millions, they county will follow.

A taking under eminent domain has to be for the good of the population.

[TeleStraightShooter]

A taking under eminent domain has to be for the good of the population.
Concur

They were numerous cases of stupid individuals thinking the law applied to them.
You claimed the state was stealing property, not individuals. If the state opens up public right of way for everyone via eminent domain how is that stealing? (as long as the deed owner is justly compensated)