You’ve not moved the argument forward. The bill is overreach, excepting the part about parking on a public way with your firearm in your vehicle.
You exaggerate the risk and need for a firearm on my property. Although I understand the insurance aspect of carrying a firearm, its actual use is quite low.
If they are there with my permission then they are there at my disposition, no? May I rescind my permission or place limitations on their staying?
You needn’t work for me or visit my store. You decide, not some law lobbied by a lobby you happen to like.
This law removes my choice. It is intentionally coercive, and in this case populist. How is this different than liberal mob rule? You just happen to like this particular law as it doesn’t infringe on your rights.
Of course, I would still support your 2nd Amendment rights even if there wasn’t a majority behind it.
The possibility of an accident with a “properly stored” firearm, should you ban it but it comes on your property just the same, is also quite low. Doesn’t this result in a verdict of “de minimus non curat lex” when approached from either side?
You exaggerate the risk and need for a firearm on my property.