Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

List Says Top Democrats Were Briefed on Interrogations; Appers Nancy Pelosi Lied
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/09/us/politics/09detain.html ^ | 5/14/09 | nytimes

Posted on 05/14/2009 9:41:20 AM PDT by wrrock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: wrrock

Obama wants someone else in charge now that he has the 60...Nancy...exit stage left.


21 posted on 05/14/2009 9:52:52 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (An oath to a liar is no oath at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Who has something to gain by her departure?

Obama himself. And, of course, Steny Hoyer -- but he doesn't have the clout with the Times to get a hit piece published.

Obama is taking her down because Pelosi fancied herself a separate power center. And there is also likely some bad blood between Rahm Emanuel and Miss Nancy.

Recall that Nancy put Rahm in charge of leading the Democrats to victory in the 2006 Congressional elections. He was successful and, as a result, Nancy got the Speakership.

But can you imagine what it would be like to work under Pelosi, at her direction? And how much thanks do you suppose he got for getting her where she is.

Yeah, I can believe there might be a grudge...

22 posted on 05/14/2009 9:53:38 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pete

Everyone.


23 posted on 05/14/2009 9:54:38 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
The NYT is reporting this!

The orders have obviously come down from Obama and the DNC for their propaganda outlets to begin easing Giant Humanoid Embarassment Pelosi out of office.

24 posted on 05/14/2009 9:56:44 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Chains you can believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

“The orders have obviously come down from Obama and the DNC for their propaganda outlets to begin easing Giant Humanoid Embarassment Pelosi out of office.”

No doubt.


25 posted on 05/14/2009 9:58:05 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Built Ford tough not Obama weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

and hell must’ve froze over LOL


26 posted on 05/14/2009 9:58:30 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember; Centurion2000

Luckilly, in good foresight, I stocked up on ammo well befor the mad craze. However, you can NEVER have enough ammo and magazines.


27 posted on 05/14/2009 9:59:42 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Built Ford tough not Obama weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Putting it on their web site doesn’t mean they’ll print in their paper, but allows them to say they “reported” it.


28 posted on 05/14/2009 10:02:52 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pete

Steny Hoyer, in collaboration with Rahm, at least according to Rush.


29 posted on 05/14/2009 10:04:38 AM PDT by SoDak (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Lets consider this...both Reid and Pelosi have no real relationship with Obama. I think both run their own games in their respective areas. I would suggest that Obama needs Pelosi out and get one of his big supporters into the position. The leaks? They are all intentional. The question here...who is the Pelosi replacement, and is this health-plan now tied to a sinking Pelosi empire so it will naturally fail? I think this is all part of the same game.


30 posted on 05/14/2009 10:12:08 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

Well, Nancy can always go back to her former vocation, that of Catholic Theologian. Things haven’t changed much since the 60’s right?


31 posted on 05/14/2009 10:14:01 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obamanation: an imploding administration headed by a clueless schmuck, with McCain as his Kowakian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

I’m so glad Obama decided to open this can of worms.


32 posted on 05/14/2009 10:17:20 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keats5

Of course we believe Panetta rather than the contemporaneous notes of the CIA officers.

NOT


33 posted on 05/14/2009 10:26:12 AM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Yes. I would not want to mess with the CIA. Strange things can happen to you.


34 posted on 05/14/2009 10:32:14 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I suspect you are right.....Obama wants a black woman? or a gay man? mmm.....decisions, decisions.


35 posted on 05/14/2009 10:34:59 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
While the new chart shows 40 Congressional interrogation briefings, the details raise questions about the effectiveness of oversight. The legal memorandums released last month showed that Abu Zubaydah had been waterboarded 83 times in August 2002, so any objection from Ms. Pelosi at the first Congressional briefing, on Sept. 4, would have come too late to prevent the use of a method considered by many legal scholars and human rights advocates to be torture.

It's an interesting spin on "she had been told that it was already being used." Of course she couldn't have prevented it from being used on that particular individual. That's entirely irrelevant. She was told it had been. And it's beginnning to look like quite a few people were. They're starting to cast this as "failure of oversight," but it was no such thing, it's second-guessing a perfectly effective oversight. That's a little less morally high-sounding and so you won't hear it until there's no other choice.

36 posted on 05/14/2009 10:41:15 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

LOL. Now that is a responsive governmental agency...


37 posted on 05/14/2009 10:54:47 AM PDT by eureka! (Elections have consequences, boy howdy. *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

This entire story must be from Prez Obey-me to replace Pelosi with “his” guy and the NYT are simply assisting our marxist prez.


38 posted on 05/14/2009 10:56:56 AM PDT by newfreep ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

“Holy crap! The NYT is reporting this!”

The Times wants Pelosi gone so 0bama can have someone more in line with his ideals.


39 posted on 05/14/2009 11:53:45 AM PDT by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727; pissant; Perdogg; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; SunkenCiv; ...
Nancy is in serious trouble.....

Related thread:

Pelosi in public dispute with CIA over interrogation

NY Times airing the Truth?

40 posted on 05/14/2009 1:55:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson