Posted on 05/14/2009 4:56:49 PM PDT by wagglebee
While your comments are quite logical, I hope you realize you are tarring by implication a very large number of perfectly innocent men who have careers or hobbies that keep them around children.
While it is quite true that men who lust after children often get involved with such things, I believe the vast majority of the men who do so are not pedophiles.
It is equally true that firebugs often become professional or volunteer fireman, but that doesn’t mean all firefighters should be suspected of sexual kinks involving the setting of fires.
The vast majority of homosexual men are not pedophiles either. It may be that a higher percentage of homosexual men are pedophiles, than of heterosexual men, but it’s still a small minority. People need to be vigilant around ALL men, and look for the markers that identify pedophiles, rather than imagining that evidence of homosexuality (proclaimed or closeted) is a key marker of pedophilia. I think it’s often easier for heterosexual pedophiles to go undetected, in large part because they tend to have appearance and manner that’s basically identical to the majority of men (i.e. heterosexual men), that the majority of men and women instinctively feel at ease with them.
It’s just a statistical/biological fact that sexual predators (of both adults and children) are overwhelmingly male. Directing focus to that fact isn’t “tarring” anyone, it’s just correct information which is more likely to help intercept a predator before he assaults his next victim, than focusing on “politically correct” notions that say we shouldn’t “profile” people. We *should* profile people, and we should profile them according to the best available factual information. This is equally true whether we’re talking about trying to protect our children from sexual assault, or trying to prevent our passenger planes from being hijacked and used as bombs.
Or, so we have been told......
Tell that to the victims of abuse by Catholic priests, virtually all of which was homosexual abuse.
Geesh. If looking at runway models (male and female) is any indication.......there ya’ go. They all look like 10-year-olds, emaciated and pale, with pouty lips.
Read it again....
The vast majority of homosexual men are not pedophiles either.””
Not true. The vast majority of male homosexuals are in fact, pederasts. More than 90% of male homos were in fact molested as children by adult male homos. This has been a common practice in the San Fran area since the 60s. It is a part of the lifestyle that yet remains in the closet. Male homosexuals even have an international organization called NAMBLA—which even had members participant in the “Gay Pride Parades.” It has been completely acceptable until the recent past when the normal community objected to this part of the deviant lifestyle choice.
That’s utter nonsense. No way are 90% of even the visible flamboyant flaunters in San Francisco pedophiles, and no way have more than a small minority of adult male homosexuals been molested when they were children (and certainly quite a few adult heterosexaul males were molested as children). Try to remember that most homosexual men aren’t running around obscenely dressed and flaunting their sexual activities in public like the crazy San Francisco crowd — that’s just a very visible subset of the male homosexual community. Many are living pretty ordinary lives, including some who are monogamous and many who are no more promiscuous than the average heterosexual in our society. And many of the ones with clearly bizarre and unhealthy sexual lifestyles aren’t into young boys, e.g. former US Senator and longtime NRA board member Larry Craig — married over 25 years, and running around public restrooms soliciting adult male strangers for sex — that’s a very common profile for adult male homosexuals.
No it isn’t nonsense. Several of the male homosexuals that infiltrated the Catholic priesthood molested more than 100 boys—they admitted to it. It is common practice in the homosexual community. “living pretty ordinary lives”” give me a break. Consuming fecal material during rimming and felching procedures may be ordinary to you, but not to normal people. You need to read up on the #1 vector for the spread of infectious diseases—male homosexuals. Male homosexuals have the highest incidence of HIV/AIDS, syphilis, drug-resistant gonorrhea, entamoeba histolytica, chlamydia, herpes simplex II, Chancroid, Drug Resistant TB, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis non A & B, just to name a few. The press of course never discusses the CDC facts, but if you want to look for yourself the information is in the scientific literature. More than any other segment of society, the homosexuals are costing us billions in medical care.
That has nothing to do with your preposterous claim that 90% of all homosexual men are pedophiles. The Catholic priesthood is especially attractive to male homosexuals who want to have sex with young boys, because it gives them easy access to young boys. There's no shortage of heterosexual men who sexually abuse young girls, and they also tend to seek employment and/or volunteer opportunities in settings that give them regular access to a lot of children. There's a huge industry of child prostitution and child porn, and it's predominantly using girls, simply because there are more heterosexual men in the world, than homosexual men. You could easily find a group of men who'd admit to having molested over 100 little girls, but that wouldn't be evidence that most heterosexual men are pedophiles.
Do you understand the concept of “incidence” of occurrence? Male homosexuals are perhaps 2-3% of the total population. Figure it out. Yes, pederasty is a part of the “gay” lifestyle. Have you heard of Nambla? The only international organization devoted to the sodomization of children on the planet.
NAMBLA is a drop in the bucket compared the size of commercial child prostitution and pornography operations around the world. NAMBLA publically positions itself as a political activist group, and has managed to convince you it’s got significant numbers and clout, but it’s really a very small outfit that’s very unwelcome in most of the gay/lesbian/etc community. Reliable statistics are hard to come by, and though they strongly suggest that a significantly higher percentage of all homosexual adult males, than of all heterosexual adult males, abuse children, your claim that “90% of homosexual men” sexually abuse boys is totally off the wall and unsupported by any evidence at all.
Where are your nambla figures suggesting it is a “drop in the bucket.” Nambla members have participated in “pride parades” across the world. They are now unpopular and homosexuals—for fear of retribution from the public show of this part of their lifestyle choice—have attempted to distance themselves. Having lived in the Bay area of San Fran for 6 years I witnessed the practice of male homosexuals molesting boys for years. It has been quite common since the late 60s and was once openly discussed. It is now back in the closet hidden from public view, much like the rimming and felching practices of the “gay” lifestyle.
But how can you fight against them when nobody wants to take it on because there are polices and procedures protecting these kind of people.
A parent of a three year old child was told by social work and police after having 1 interview with that child at her nursery alone
(not even her nursery teacher was allowed to sit with her during this interview)
That they would not be taken matters any further
(may I add this was over a phone call to the mother)
because her daughter never said the actual words
I've being sexually abused
(what child no’s these words)
and that was it the end of the conversation
no support or advice nothing.
Now being a youth worker and hearing for myself the child coming out with things that sent alarm bells ringing all over the place.
I had advised her to report it and to follow the correct procedure which she had already done part of those by removing the child from imediate danger.
But had to take it further because other children could be in danger.
This disgusts me and I ve lost all faith in the system.
All this advertisement on our tv’s and billboards is just for show when behind the scenes our children are not being protected by the law
Why do Scotsmen wear kilts?
Because children can hear zippers.
Homosexuals abuse over 200 boys to a heterosexual’s 8 girls. Both are extremely sick, yes, but the male homosexuals have been proven to be far more promiscuous than normal people. Lust is the No.1 concern for them....always. They have little control over the urge as proven by homosexual priests (despite intensive religious indoctrination). Homosexual accepting cultures always have “paedophilia” as a way to intitiate the young into the unnatural lifestyle. http://www.nambla.org/pederasty.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.