Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Elected Officials' Pay Will Be Cut 18%
Los Angeles Times ^ | May 21, 2009 | Patrick McGreevy and Ann M. Simmons

Posted on 05/20/2009 5:13:26 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Citing pay decreases and layoffs being imposed on rank-and-file state workers, the California Citizens Compensation Commission approved the reduction, which also applies to the state attorney general, superintendent of public instruction, controller, insurance commissioner, treasurer, lieutenant governor, secretary of state and members of the Board of Equalization.

"I think they should share in the sacrifices that everyone else has had to encounter," Commissioner Kathy Sands, a former Auburn mayor, said after the panel's 5-1 vote at a meeting in Burbank.

The commission had wanted to decrease current officials' pay, but the panel's attorney said California law does not allow that.

Commission Chairman Charles Murray said the panel's move would allow savings close to those that would have been achieved if a 10% cut had gone into effect this year and continued through next year.

"We see nothing on the horizon that is going to bring us out of" the state budget crisis, Murray said. "How do you find $21 billion in one year?"

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who appoints the commissioners and supported their action today, does not take a salary. One legislator, Sen. Abel Maldonado (R-Santa Maria), said he would voluntarily accept the pay cut effective June 1.

But state Sen. Denise Moreno Ducheny (D-San Diego), who will be termed out of the Legislature next year, called the decrease "excessive" and "punitive" and said it may discourage some people from running for state office.

A month ago, members proposed a 10% cut. Today, they cited Tuesday's election results, which will push the state budget deficit as high as $21.3 billion, in making the larger reduction.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2009; california; calinitiatives; callegislature; government; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: patton

No comment on 39?


41 posted on 05/20/2009 8:10:07 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Sure - congrats to CA on finding some sense. It was a good move.

However, with all of the mandated funding (ballot iniatives for this, that, and the other...), how much of CA’s spending can the legislature eliminate?

Not to justify their massive overspending, just curious what they can legally do.


42 posted on 05/20/2009 8:13:30 PM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: patton
how much of CA’s spending can the legislature eliminate?

The tax payers are out of money. Do the numbers....lol

43 posted on 05/20/2009 8:15:25 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: patton
Sure - congrats to CA

Hope that didn't hurt too much.

44 posted on 05/20/2009 8:16:14 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: al baby

C’mon, Arnie’s governor’s salary doesn’t even pay for his yearly body oil usage.


45 posted on 05/20/2009 8:17:36 PM PDT by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Here is an example - I am sure CA is obligated legally to make payment on their various bonds. That is probably 20% of an honest budget, right there.


46 posted on 05/20/2009 8:17:49 PM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Not at all - I sincerely meant it.


47 posted on 05/20/2009 8:18:45 PM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: patton

So what do you think of the fact that California’s just murdered Republican Schwarzenegger’s future political career?


48 posted on 05/20/2009 8:21:28 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

He had one? Who knew.


49 posted on 05/20/2009 8:25:00 PM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"How do you find $21 billion in one year?"

Easy: Cut the things that you increased to get the deficit in the first place.

50 posted on 05/20/2009 8:27:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
"Phuquers will be trying to float a bond, against projected future cuts."

Legislative derrivatives!

51 posted on 05/20/2009 8:30:22 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: patton
So what do you think of the fact that California’s just murdered Republican Schwarzenegger’s future political career?

He had one? Who knew.

Apparently you didn't.

He is/was governor of the most populated state.

Of course, his short political career is done now.

lol

52 posted on 05/20/2009 8:31:08 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
But state Sen. Denise Moreno Ducheny (D-San Diego), who will be termed out of the Legislature next year, called the decrease "excessive" and "punitive" and said it may discourage some people from running for state office.

I prefer to think of it in Clinton terms. They deserve a 40% pay cut, so they should think about this as being a 22% pay increase.

53 posted on 05/21/2009 12:43:06 AM PDT by altair (My vote didn't count, I voted in California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
One legislator, Sen. Abel Maldonado (R-Santa Maria), said he would voluntarily accept the pay cut effective June 1.

Yay, State Senator Maldonado! You're definitely one of the (embarrassingly few) Good Guys in CA state government.

54 posted on 05/21/2009 12:54:02 AM PDT by altair (My vote didn't count, I voted in California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: altair; calcowgirl

Um, not Maldonado. He’s a liberal RINO asshat weasel to rival Ah-nold.


55 posted on 05/21/2009 6:22:25 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson