Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Vows Not To Send People To War Without Cause [Whom Is He Talking About?]
AP Report ^ | May 22, 2009

Posted on 05/22/2009 12:09:46 PM PDT by Steelfish

Obama vows not to send people to war without cause

By DARLENE SUPERVILLE, Associated Press

ANNAPOLIS, Md. – President Barack Obama promised graduating midshipmen at the U.S. Naval Academy on Friday that, as their commander in chief, he will only send them "into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary." In his first address to military graduates, Obama also pledged to invest in the men and women who defend America's liberty, not just in the weapons they would take with them into battle against 21st century threats.

"I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support that you need to get the job done," the president told more than 1,000 graduates during a sun-splashed ceremony at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 2009commencements; bho44; bhocommencements; bhodod; usna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2009 12:09:46 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary"

...or when they polls say I should

2 posted on 05/22/2009 12:11:20 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This guy is simply a Bad Joke.

FUB0


3 posted on 05/22/2009 12:11:27 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

what a fruitcake


4 posted on 05/22/2009 12:11:36 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support that you need to get the job done," the president said.

So does this mean he's going to get (1) a strategy; (2) well-defined goals; (3) equipment; and (4) support for the thousands of US service men and women ALREADY in harm's way in Iraq and Afghanistan????

5 posted on 05/22/2009 12:11:51 PM PDT by PERKY2004 (Proud Military Wife ... please pray for my deployed husband (deployment #6 to Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Yeah right, Obama will send you only to places the United Nations wants you to go and be peace keepers. I'm a disabled vet due to injuries incurred in a war time situation and I would do it all over again, even if the results were to stay the same.
Obama has no clue what is right to do when it comes to the military. Hell, with his interests in taking away all the guns from the American people, he will send our troops in action with no protection.
6 posted on 05/22/2009 12:14:10 PM PDT by antiunion person (Listen to this YouTube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Gosh! I thought that he would send our military into war when it was not necessary. Thanks for clarification. Chairman BO is a cliche.
7 posted on 05/22/2009 12:14:20 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Obama = FUBAR


8 posted on 05/22/2009 12:14:20 PM PDT by mort56 (He who would sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"I will only send you into harm's way when it is absolutely necessary

To invade Pakistan?

9 posted on 05/22/2009 12:14:49 PM PDT by Long Island Pete (Stupidity is in the DNA of liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary”

When hasn’t it been necessary. War is necessary, without war there is no peace.


10 posted on 05/22/2009 12:18:39 PM PDT by PJBankard (Americans love a winner, and will not tolerate a loser. -Gen. George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Won't send anyone into harm's way without Coz


11 posted on 05/22/2009 12:23:51 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

...WTF?...

I bet they all were saying this when they heard the illegal CIC say that. With a heavy arm, they saluted but only as protocol and not honor to the moron that just insulted them.

12 posted on 05/22/2009 12:24:53 PM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

Do you think 0 might be referring to JFK? FDR? Woodrow Wilson?


13 posted on 05/22/2009 12:25:02 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RepublitarianRoger2

Good one :)


14 posted on 05/22/2009 12:25:48 PM PDT by 4Godsoloved..Hegave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“Obamateur outlaws pizza delivery missions.” Yeah, right.


15 posted on 05/22/2009 12:25:54 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Tyranny is always whimsical." Mark Steyn 3/9/2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; All

An absence of war is not necessarily peace. “Peace” existed (according to the left) when Saddam Hussein was in power and yet there were mass graves.

Let me reiterate: An absence of war is not necessarily peace.

Too many people mistakenly believe that no war equals peace.


16 posted on 05/22/2009 12:25:56 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“Do you think 0 might be referring to JFK? FDR? Woodrow Wilson?”

I’m thinking he was referring to the Continental Congress and George Washington.


17 posted on 05/22/2009 12:27:39 PM PDT by PJBankard (Americans love a winner, and will not tolerate a loser. -Gen. George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“What’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?”

Madeleine K. Albright


18 posted on 05/22/2009 12:30:14 PM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mort56

BO is no W when it comes to Liberty. The persecuted people around the globe have nobody to fight for them. Rogue states are free to do what they please, no fearing the USA anymore.

Our foreign policy- Clinton “N.Korea you better not make nukes”, Iran “Let’s talk about nukes.” bO was wrong on all military decisions prior to gaining office and we expect him to be right now?

Just like “the most transparent government in history” claim when BO was the most secretive candidate ever. Do we wait til 2012 or do we call his bluff? $1 MILLION SPENT PROTECTING HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE.


19 posted on 05/22/2009 12:30:43 PM PDT by jpatt (BO_smells)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Is it possible to get dumber each day?


20 posted on 05/22/2009 12:30:48 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson