Posted on 05/26/2009 7:15:53 PM PDT by neverdem
I have a great deal of empathy for President Obama on matters like North Korea and Iran — both lunatic players that I think represent firsts in his own experience. You see, there are no good choices, and he can't simply vote "present" this time. Any decision he makes will be evaluated not necessarily on the basis of its superior logic or the eloquence with which it is presented, but solely on whether it works or not. If it does, he will be praised; if it doesn't, he will be damned, unfairly or not. Soon some wannabe Republican presidential candidate will be barnstorming the country, second-guessing Obama's decision-making, giving him no benefit of the doubt, and adopting simplistic answers as a candidate that he could not possibly embrace as Commander-in-Chief — the one constant being that whatever Obama does, the potential rival, without the responsibilities of office, will argue that it was wrong.
Fate, chance, luck, and more will contribute to the outcome of any presidential action — unpredictable, of course, but in the cruel game of assessing presidential decision-making, no grounds for excuse.
Moreover, both these problems not only antedated Obama, but antedated Bush as well, yet they cannot be massaged with "reset" button and a "Bush did it," nor by soaring "hope and change" rhetoric. Neither Ahmadinejad nor Kim Jong-il care a whit about Obama's landmark advance to the presidency, or his sober and judicious efforts to show rational concern for their own predicaments; instead, they calibrate only the degree to which Obama poses an obstacle to their regional ambitions, whether they be rational or not.
In short, Obama will be dealing with two cruel entities, irrational at times, and both capable of great evil — thuggish regimes that laugh at calls for UN solidarity or multilateral fronts. Worse still, the soft-power advocates and internationalists abroad who praised Obama to the skies for his restraint and postmodern campaign rhetoric will be the first to damn him as Carteresque and hesitant should these two rogue nations begin to act a little crazy and start testing the waters.
Agreed. Actually, any president "chooses" to put himself in difficult positions.... it's more a matter of their reasons for doing so.
Some, such as Ronald Reagan, do so primarily out of of duty. Obama's (and Clinton's) reasons included a significant component of self-gratification. And in Obama's case, I think narcissism plays an unduly large role both in his decision to run, and in his subsequent behavior.
Obama's position is indeed absurd; but Obama almost certainly does not see it that way.
I wish there were a coterie of "Scoop Jackson Democrats" today.
They had Joe Lieberman, but they gave him the boot.
We are in trouble, as you point out, because politics makes hash of any national defense policies.
Go read my other posts before you open your yap.
Oh I have.... unfortunately, I have.
And, unfortunately, I’ve read your naive responses, too.
Go stick your head in the sand again, because, poor, poor O is in a rough situation.
He is purposefully pushing us and our children into utter hell on earth, and you choose to empathize with him.
Brilliant.
Yawn.....
The ultimate reply of the soundly defeated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.