Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arjun tanks ready for comparative trials with Russian T-90
newkerala ^ | 27/05/209 | Praful Kumar Singh

Posted on 05/27/2009 11:19:03 PM PDT by pobeda1945

The Defence Research and Development Organisation handed sixteen tanks (cumulative 45 Arjun tanks) to Lt. Gen. D. Bhardwaj, Director General Mechanised Force (DGMF), for formation of the first Arjun regiment at a function in Avadi today.

"The regiment of 45 tanks will be subjected to a conversion training and field practice for a period of three months. Thereafter, the Army is planning to conduct a comparative trial with T 90 tanks in October or November 2009 to assess the operational deployment role of the tanks. The present batch of 124 tanks will be delivered by March 2010," a Defence Ministry official told ANI.

The trials could deliver the final verdict on the combat vehicle, which took 35 years of research in self-reliance by dedicated Indian scientists against all odds, costing over Rs. 300 crore.

The DRDO has been demanding for the comparative trials of Arjun with T-90 tanks, which is being seen as an effort to meet criticism against the indigenous combat vehicle. Around 500 tanks would need to be manufactured to make the project successful.

The Army has made it clear that it will buy no more than the 124 Arjuns tanks that it has contracted for because it is unhappy with the tank on various counts.

"The Army cleared the acquisition of Arjun tanks after it carried out the Accelerated Usage Cum Reliability Trials (AUCRT) in five phases on two tanks from November 2007 to August 2008 covering more than 8000 km and 800 rounds of firing in each tank," the official said.

AUCRT is required for assessing the spares requirement for the entire life of the tank besides evaluation of reliability of tank.

The DRDO's Avadi-based Combat Vehicles Research and Development Establishment (CVRDE) will manufacture a total of 124 Arjun MBTs at a cost of Rs. 1,760 crores. Of the total 124, CVRDE had already delivered 29 MBTs in two instalments till March this year.

Arjun tank was meant to supplement and eventually replace the Soviet-era T-72 MBT and was originally meant to be a 40-tonne tank with a 105 mm gun. It has now grown to a 50-tonne tank with a 120 mm gun.

Arjun tanks can fire at a range of 3-4 km and have great mobility and are equipped with high protection facility.


Arjun


T-90


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: india; military; russia; tank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Dosa26

Many of the new ones do. Plus helicopter and airplane attacks.


21 posted on 05/28/2009 4:56:51 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

One thing the Russians are very proud of is their automatic loader, which enables them to use a three man crew. The Arjun (like all western tanks) has no autoloader, and uses a 4 man crew.

It turns out that if you are doing extended operations, with crews pulling their own security, it is much better to have a 4th man to split the guard shifts. Also, the autoloaders can jam.

In the first gulf war, you may have noticed all the burnt up Iraqi tanks had their turrets blown off. This is because the autoloader uses ammunition stored in a vertical position, around the turret. In western tanks, with manual loading, the ammunition is stored horizontal, usually behind a blast door, with weakened blowout panels above, to direct explosions out.

For this reason alone, I would put my money on the Arjun. The Russians’ stubborn use of the autoloader has always been a problem for their tanks.


22 posted on 05/28/2009 5:03:28 AM PDT by lacrew (Axe not what your teleprompter can do for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

As far as I understand like any weapon system autoloader has its own disadvantages and advantages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoloader


23 posted on 05/28/2009 5:11:53 AM PDT by pobeda1945
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Thanks. That makes sense. It still looks wrong, even with reactive armor. Whoever makes the purchasing decisions on it knows the threats it will face better than I do though.


24 posted on 05/28/2009 7:49:56 AM PDT by Dosa26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945
I'm partial to the Ripsaw...


25 posted on 05/29/2009 6:34:07 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Another potential reason to avoid Russian gear is that Russia gives indications of being back into the expansionist empire mode again. Being dependent on that supply line may end up with more strings attached than a nation’s sovereignty can withstand.

I’m not from India, but I do heavily favor the people of that nation (and any other nation) building their own military hardware in their own factories for their own purposes. That’s about the only way to ensure spare parts and other supply issues any more, for anyone.


26 posted on 05/29/2009 6:17:21 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson