Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey: Army would have to ‘shift gears’ for N. Korea battle
Stars and Stripes ^ | May 30, 2009 | Jeff Schogol

Posted on 05/28/2009 5:34:54 PM PDT by xzins

WASHIGTON – It would take the Army time to "shift gears" if it needed to fight against North Korea, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey said Thursday.

Right now, the Army is focused on the counterinsurgency efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, but North Korea’s recent saber rattling has raised the prospect that the Army might be called upon to fight a conventional war.

"I have said publicly for some time that if we had to shift gears, it would probably take us about 90 days or so to shift our gears and to train the folks up that were preparing to go to Iraq and Afghanistan to go someplace else," Casey said after a speech at a Washington think tank.

That doesn’t mean that it would take at least 90 days to send reinforcements to U.S. troops in South Korea, Casey said.

"We would move forces as rapidly as we could get them prepared," he said.

Casey declined to say how fast the Army could mobilize to meet a threat from North Korea, but he stressed the Army is "combat seasoned" and can move quickly.

"The mechanical skills of artillery gunnery and tank gunnery come back very, very quickly," he said. "The harder part is the integration — that really brigade level and above of massing fires and effects in a very constricted period of time as opposed to what you do in a counterinsurgency over a much longer extended period of time."

Looking to the future, Casey said he expects conflicts this century to look a lot like the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as the Israeli war with Hezbollah in 2006.

Regarding the latter, Casey noted that the key lesson the Israelis learned was that they were too focused on irregular warfare.

"They were working so much in the West Bank and conducting counterinsurgency-like operations that they lost their combined arms skills, the ability to integrate fires in air and tanks and artillery," he said.

The U.S. Army needs to be prepared for the "full spectrum" operations ranging from offensive, defensive and stability operations, he said.

Casey expressed confidence that the U.S. Army can fight and win a conventional war against North Korea given its experience in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"I’m not afraid of putting this force in the field against anybody," he said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; bhoasia; georgecasey; korea; northkorea; saberrattling; testingobama; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

Do you think they would commit aircraft?

I’m not sure why you think they wouldn’t commit troops though. I don’t think they’d like to see North Korea absorbed by the South.

China played an important role there before. I’m not convinced China isn’t helping NK out there now either.


41 posted on 05/28/2009 6:03:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The nuclear mines on the corridor will impede the invasion


42 posted on 05/28/2009 6:04:40 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Thanks for the comments. I appreciate the info.


43 posted on 05/28/2009 6:04:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xzins

We don’t have to shift anything if we nuke them.


44 posted on 05/28/2009 6:05:10 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

SK would fight.


45 posted on 05/28/2009 6:06:06 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

Thanks for your honest assessment.


46 posted on 05/28/2009 6:06:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

They could dump a ton of artillery on the capital in a day, I doubt they’d take the capital that fast. Its a long walk.


47 posted on 05/28/2009 6:07:02 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

May be true. The question is whether or not they could challenge the airspace any. The airpower of today could make that exceedingly expensive.


48 posted on 05/28/2009 6:07:06 PM PDT by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Didn’t Biden say that Obama would be tested, AND that many would consider his response a failure....

Something like that, wasn’t it???


49 posted on 05/28/2009 6:07:40 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: farlander
But they couldn’t move in south. That border is one of the most well defended ones.

________________________________________________

Oh really? Know how many troops are on the ground in Panmunjun? Fewer than 600 Battalion Scouts (Light Infantry). These troops are nothing but a speed bump and they know it.

Drive south from the DMZ some time, every half mile to mile (iirc)is a fall-back position (berm with a gap). Every bridge over those gaps is wired to come down. Dragons teeth litter the fields in front of the berms.

The entire northern part of South Korea is designed to be given up but at a cost.

50 posted on 05/28/2009 6:08:29 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: randog
They (the south I mean) have an army of half a million men, we have a tenth of that there on the ground. But we'd ramp to match them within 3 to 6 months.
51 posted on 05/28/2009 6:08:37 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Curly was always my favorite!


52 posted on 05/28/2009 6:09:33 PM PDT by GL of Sector 2814 (One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word. -- R A Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I think China could lend considerable logistical support, and there can be no doubt that China would love to see the west, particularly the U.S. humiliated by a defeat in Korea. China may not get directly involved, but it's presence as rearguard could allow all of N. Korea's substantial army to empty into the south. There's also the possibility of China pulling an East Germany. If things go bad for N. Korea, they may roll into the North under the pretense of enforcing peace, then either hold onto it, or prop up the N. Korean regime under their tutelage like East Germany and the Soviets.
53 posted on 05/28/2009 6:10:36 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: farlander

“The question is whether or not they could challenge the airspace any.”

No question about it, we own the air over SK. A lot of anti-air over NK would make it tight but their air power is minimal.


54 posted on 05/28/2009 6:10:56 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GL of Sector 2814

Too bad they don’t have these guys on today. I’ll bet if I looked around on all the cable channels I have, I could find them somewhere.


55 posted on 05/28/2009 6:11:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Problem is the opening artillery and rocket attack would hurt S. Korea very bad. We could take out many of the guns pretty quick, but not before a lot of damage could be done.

That and we don't have a whole lot of troops on the ground there.

56 posted on 05/28/2009 6:11:07 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
To sell them to Iran, of course. Who will give some to Hezbollah and Hamas and Al-Q, touse on Israel and on us.
57 posted on 05/28/2009 6:11:08 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000; All; xzins

58 posted on 05/28/2009 6:11:09 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It would take the Army time to "shift gears" if it needed to fight against North Korea, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey said Thursday.

There is no possibility that Obama OR the Congress will fight in Korea.

But that's OK, because the war is here.

59 posted on 05/28/2009 6:12:41 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Pas d'ennmis a droit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No more Task Force Charlie?


60 posted on 05/28/2009 6:12:42 PM PDT by CHATTAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson