[stylin_geek]

What galls me most is the article. The article describes this guy as a “late term abortion provider.”

Why not label the doctor what he was, a partial birth abortion provider? The man committed infanticide, legally.

And, yes, I agree with you, this will have a bad ending for us abortion opponents.

Due to the innocuous euphemism used to describe what this doctor engaged in, there will be no sympathy for abortion foes.

My mom is a “right to choose” person. Yet, even she thinks partial birth abortion is an atrocity. Most people agree that partial birth abortion is infanticide.

Instead, the press will portray this doctor as a paragon of community spirit, family values and work ethic.

The spin already started with this article.

[eccentric]

Why not label the doctor what he was, a partial birth abortion provider?

Tiller doesn't --ur --didn't do partial birth abortions. He stabbed the baby's heart with a hypodermic needle of digoxen (or something like that) to kill them with a heart attack before they were born. FYI

[Kid Shelleen]

>> even she thinks partial birth abortion is an atrocity <<

I know some "pro choice" people that did even know what a partial birth abortion was until I explained it to them. I wonder if his defense attorney will be allowed to introduce into evidence a description or graphic of a partial birth abortion.
The killer should have used his passion to work within the system to try and change the culture. He deserves what ever punishment the legal system meets out. As abhorent as the practice is, it is still legal..