Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jumbo Jet Packed With British Tourists Seconds From Disaster After It Fails To Rise On Take-Off
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | May 31st 2009

Posted on 05/31/2009 7:58:41 PM PDT by Steelfish

Jumbo jet packed with British tourists seconds from disaster after it fails to rise on take-off

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER 01st June 2009

Hundreds of passengers narrowly avoided disaster when their plane nearly crashed after taking off.

The British Airways plane shook violently and did not rise more than 30ft above the ground as it set off from Johannesburg to London.

The pilot has been praised for his quick actions in keeping the Boeing 747 in the air, saving the lives of the 256 passengers on board.

Miraculous escape: The British Airways Boeing 747, similar to this one, is thought to have gone into landing mode so that the flaps that make it rise did not work

Travelling at 200mph, he dumped enough fuel for the aircraft to eventually gain height, before returning it to the airport.

It is believed that a technical fault caused the plane to go into landing mode so that the flaps that normally make it rise did not work.

An investigation is under way as to how the jet came so close to crashing.

A BA spokesman said: 'As a precaution BA56 Johannesburg to Heathrow flight on Monday May 11 returned to the airport shortly after take-off due to a suspected technical problem.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 747; airlines; aviation; ba; baboeing747; blessing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: U S Army EOD

Glad everyone’s okay, but I’m glad you caught that flap thing, too.

Flaps is flaps. Need ‘em for landing, helpful for takeoff.

Not enough thrust, perhaps? I hate reading about aviation written my general news reporters. Gee, I wonder if they get this political thing right, too...


41 posted on 05/31/2009 10:19:03 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. And NEVER GIVE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zipper

Exactly. It doesn’t sound like deploying the flaps while in the takeoff roll would be such a good idea.


42 posted on 05/31/2009 10:20:15 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. And NEVER GIVE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: biff

Good comparison.....we shall see


43 posted on 06/01/2009 2:39:36 AM PDT by dennisw (Weakness is a Crime! Don't be a Criminal - Bernarr MacFadden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: crghill

I landed at Bulverde. My daughter was stationed at Fort Sam. Make it back in only one day. Those things cruise at 90 mph and I carry 24 gal of fuel. Was fun trip.


44 posted on 06/01/2009 3:50:14 AM PDT by U S Army EOD (Say Cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“technical fault caused the plane to go into landing mode”

If flaps were not extended at the start of the takeoff roll EICAS would have generated a CAS warning and a NO TAKEOFF aural would be screaching in the cockpit - hard to miss.


45 posted on 06/01/2009 4:05:52 AM PDT by dozer7 (Love many, trust few and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson