1 posted on
06/01/2009 3:22:50 PM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
How can he prove his case if he’s not allowed to eamine or count the ballots? Or am I missing something?
2 posted on
06/01/2009 3:24:40 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SmithL
But several justices said he failed to provide proof that such practices were widespread or affected the outcome. With a couple of hundred votes separating the two, it doesn't have to be all that widespread to affect the outcome. Duh...
3 posted on
06/01/2009 3:25:03 PM PDT by
dirtboy
To: SmithL
If Franken(stein) gets in, I will take that as a sign that God will be judging Washington D.C.
4 posted on
06/01/2009 3:25:21 PM PDT by
pray4liberty
(http://www.foundersvalues.com/)
To: SmithL
Elias (Frnken's Lawyer) responded that Coleman failed to prove how many ballots were illegally cast That is a tacit admission, by a Democrat attorney, that illegal votes were cast!
So, if Franken wins, the bar has been raised. Not only do Republican's have to prove that illegal votes were cast, they are then expected to be able to determine how many illegal votes were cast by democrat operatives.
9 posted on
06/01/2009 3:47:36 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
To: SmithL
You can’t have a fair election if the same standards are not used statewide for determining whether or not a ballot is accepted or rejected.
12 posted on
06/01/2009 8:37:27 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson