Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre

And it seems natural that a woman would die for her child, but not so natural that a woman would kill her child for her own sake.


8 posted on 06/06/2009 10:39:09 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham

well, if that same eskimo woman thought her own death wasn’t enough to stretch the food supply out long enough for the rest, she might also take a small child with her, or a sick one...I’m guessing. I never read this I’m only hypothesizing that it seems logical.

So now in this example, wouldn’t the mother be guilty of deciding who should live and who should die? I don’t have kids btw. This is purely a hypothetical for me.


11 posted on 06/06/2009 10:48:10 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson