Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: USSC delays Chrysler asset sale!
CNBC Breaking News (live) ^ | 08 JUL 09 | dcbryan1

Posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:48 PM PDT by DCBryan1

Breaking on CNBC:

USSC delays Chyrsler asset sale!

Mourdock: USe of Tarp Funds in automotive industry was illegal

Obama admin had urged USSC NOT to keep chrysler deal on hold


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alito; automakers; bankruptcy; bho44; bhoscotus; bitchslap; breyer; chapter11; chapter7; chrysler; dictatorspeedbump; fiat; ginsberg; gm; irs; italy; judicialactivism; kennedy; obama; roberts; ruleoflaw; ruling; scalia; scalito; scotus; sotomayor; stephens; tarp; thomas; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-294 next last
To: Reagan69
KEY QUOTE:>

A group of Indiana pension funds argued that the sale of Chrysler unlawfully rewards unsecured creditors ahead of secured lenders and amounts to an illegal reorganization plan, and that the U.S. Treasury Department overstepped its legal authority by using bailout funds for Chrysler when Congress intended the money for banks.

Unlawfully rewards unsecured creditors = UAW

They shouldn't get a dime and infact should be shown the door, there are a lot of folks around without jobs that would love to join a non-union shop and help make America better.
81 posted on 06/08/2009 1:39:41 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

Yep - my tagline means “Obama has replaced the rule of law with the rule of a despot...”

Or, at least he is trying to.


82 posted on 06/08/2009 1:40:54 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Qoud licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: technically right
Please, Oh PLEASE have them ACORN fellers come on down to Indiana. I’d be real happy to show ‘em my gun collection

One of the groups that wanted this stopped is the cop union. Somehow I don't see the community organizers intimidating the cops. I mean if something were to happened to the people doing the intimidating, who would they call?
83 posted on 06/08/2009 1:41:22 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

What they really argued is that the deal was a scam, designed to bilk the mortgage company, while giving all the proceeds from the sale of the house to the maid.

And it was.


84 posted on 06/08/2009 1:43:28 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Qoud licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate

Even the Clitoon News Network (CNN) header decalres : “ A Blow to Bambi”


85 posted on 06/08/2009 1:44:20 PM PDT by libscum (don't sit out- vote Mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Maryhere
I remember Buzzy Ginsburgs confirmation hearing.

She worked 30 years in DC. She never once hired a black.

NEVER...., NOT ONCE.

86 posted on 06/08/2009 1:44:35 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Apparently the SCOTUS doesn’t like bHo’s justice department telling them what to do. Ya think?


87 posted on 06/08/2009 1:45:00 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; All

Supreme Court Delays Chrysler Sale

http://www.howeypolitics.com/2009/06/08/supreme-court-delays-chrysler-sale/

The U.S. Supreme Court has delayed the merger of Chrysler and Fiat late this afternoon. The Supreme Court will delay the sale of assets until it hears the appeal by Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock, who said the Chrysler-Fiat deal harmed three Indiana pension funds.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg issued the delay just moments ago. It will be referred to all nine Supreme Court justices. There is no indication when the Supreme Court will hear the case. Fiat SP had wanted this sale consumated by June 15.

Without Ginsberg’s decision, the Chrysler/Fiat merger would have been signed at 4:01 p.m.

Now the future of Chrysler is up in the air and analysts believe the delay could scuttle the deal, sending Chrysler into liquidation.

“We’re hoping that the Supreme Court interprets the law,” said Tom Lauria, the attorney who pressed the case for Treasurer Mourdock. Lauria said that the case is not against Chrysler or Fiat. “We hope it will be done in a lawful fashion.”

Lauria said that he is awaiting word on when the Supreme Court will act. The current order simply stays the merger.

At stake could be 5,000 Chrysler jobs in Kokomo and thousands more in auto supplier companies across the state, including Cummins Engine in Columbus.

“All the cards are back in the air,” said CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin.

Mourdock pressed the case after consulting with Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who urged Mourdock to appeal the sale. It sets up an unprecedented situation where two Indiana government executives appear to be blocking a corporate merger with thousands of jobs hanging in the balance.

Earlier in the day the Justice Department urged the U.S. Supreme Court today to uphold the sale of most of Chrysler LLC’s “good assets,” and allow it to emerge from bankruptcy.

In a 26-page brief filed by the solicitor general, the government argued that Chrysler would be worth only $800 million if forced to liquidate.

Under the bankruptcy exit plan upheld Friday by a federal appeals court in New York, the Treasury Department has agreed to give the holders of $6.9 billion in secured debt a total of $2 billion in cash — or 29 cents on the dollar.

“The bankruptcy court found that the challenged sale is the only feasible alternative to liquidation, and that applicants would receive no more under a liquidation than they will receive if the sale goes forward.

Absent a persuasive reason to believe that one or both of those findings is erroneous — and applicants offer none — a stay would not alleviate the injury that applicants have identified,” the government wrote in its brief.

Late Friday night Mourdock said, “As the case has moved through the entire court system, it’s becoming increasingly apparent to financial analysts and legal observers that our case and claims are about much, much more than simply Chrysler’s assets.

It’s about more than the interest of Hoosier retirees; it’s about rule of law. ”

~~~

Hear, hear!


88 posted on 06/08/2009 1:45:46 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Let’s hope this is Step One of an FDR-style push back by the SCOTUS against Obama.


89 posted on 06/08/2009 1:47:09 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Lots of rulings...is New Haven next? God help us all if they uphold Sotomoron.


90 posted on 06/08/2009 1:47:51 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

SOMEONE CALL MATT DRUGE!


91 posted on 06/08/2009 1:47:57 PM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
IMHO it was a mistake to kick sand in the face of the Court. Gets all of them excited.
92 posted on 06/08/2009 1:48:20 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit (Two terms for politicians, one in office, one in jail.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

That is the typical behavior of white liberals.


93 posted on 06/08/2009 1:48:57 PM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: libscum
Even the Clitoon News Network (CNN) header decalres : “ A Blow to Bambi”

LOL! I can't wait to hear what Mandow and Olberputz have to say.

94 posted on 06/08/2009 1:49:45 PM PDT by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“Without Ginsberg’s decision, the Chrysler/Fiat merger would have been signed at 4:01 p.m.”

And the music (Republic) would have died...


95 posted on 06/08/2009 1:51:17 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Qoud licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Welcome to O’s Zimbabwe ..... contracts not required.


96 posted on 06/08/2009 1:51:44 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
“We’re hoping that the Supreme Court interprets the law,” said Tom Lauria, the attorney who pressed the case for Treasurer Mourdock. Lauria said that the case is not against Chrysler or Fiat. “We hope it will be done in a lawful fashion.”

Yes, that would be a refreshing change!
97 posted on 06/08/2009 1:51:51 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
Oh, dear God, preserve our Republic.

Amen, Lord. We praise You and thank You!

98 posted on 06/08/2009 1:52:35 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate
LOL! I can't wait to hear what Mandow and Olberputz have to say.

Olbermann will make Ginsburg his "Worst Person of the Day".

99 posted on 06/08/2009 1:53:30 PM PDT by Texican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

I hope Chrysler and SCOTUS can set this right. When it comes to the using of TARP funds it seems like a gigantic money-laundering scam, really. The government BOUGHT these companies and the right to oversee them with the stimulus money, it was all sleight of hand, IMHO... I hate to see what this will do to Chrysler itself...

If the Congress passes an Unconstitutional Law, and the President signs it, and then SCOTUS rules against the TARP funds altogether, does the US get their money back (meaning the tax payers), or are they going to say it’s all gone?

What about all the other companies who received funds. Would they then owe them back to the government? [I’d love to see ACORN slapped with a bill of a few million dollars that they received.] I’m guessing TARP receiving companies are going to be spending the money as quick as they can now, eh? Seems like that would be a typical reaction...

At least SCOTUS recognizes the importance of overseeing what the Executive Branch is doing in the private affairs of these countries. Can’t see how it is Constitutional for the President to appoint a board of directors, or hire and fire within a company.

Could we possibly be seeing our system work though??? Checks and Balances? Is someone on SCOTUS waking up to the nightmare they are forcing on us, and against the Constitution? I sure hope so...


100 posted on 06/08/2009 1:53:55 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson