Skip to comments.
Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading
-- Even BB guns could be on the chopping block
Gun Owners of America ^
| April 21, 2009
| NA
Posted on 06/09/2009 3:12:11 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: neverdem; KoRn; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; ...
41
posted on
06/09/2009 9:31:04 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: neverdem
We probably need to pass a law stating that the constitution of the United States and the bill of rights trump all treaties and cannot be superseded or modified by any treaty.
To: nonsporting
43
posted on
06/10/2009 4:42:23 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Eaker
Thanks, Eaker. I see the accent on "labe" is also wrong here.
Now that I think about, the retroflex accent on the ultima of "molon" (participle) should probably be a circumflex.
To: neverdem
they want vague laws and treaties that lets them do whatever they want
45
posted on
06/10/2009 9:36:20 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: neverdem; All
Mine guns are loaded. If you want them, come get them if you think you can.
46
posted on
06/10/2009 11:49:49 AM PDT
by
BlackjackPershing
(“The patriot's blood is the seed of Freedom's tree” - Thomas Campbell (Scottish poet))
To: Charles Martel
Obama is very near the edge of the map with this s--t. Beyond this point, there be dragons. Yes, there are. Obama should consider the old proverb.
47
posted on
06/10/2009 5:23:20 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: neverdem
FYI, there is no NEED for the Supremes to consider 2nd Amendment Incorporation! FACT: The 2nd Amendment is SELF-incorporated to all government entities at every level. It is MORE ABSOLUTE than the 1st Amendment, or any of the others, because the wording forbids not only CONGRESS, but ANYONE from infringing on it. The 1st says Congress shall make no law.... The 2nd say shall NOT be infringed! Period! End of debate!
48
posted on
06/11/2009 10:32:02 AM PDT
by
2harddrive
(then)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson