Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kathleen Parker Hits New Low: Palin 'Invited' Letterman Sex Jokes, Seeks Power as 'Aphrodisiac'
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 | Kristinn

Posted on 06/10/2009 2:19:57 PM PDT by kristinn

Kathleen Parker, an obscure Washington Post syndicated columnist who made herself famous by attacking Republican Vice Presidential nominee Alaska Governor Sarah Palin last fall, said that Palin 'invited' vicious sex jokes made this week by CBS Television Late Night host David Letterman. Parker also made degrading, sexist comments of her own about Palin.

Parker made the comment in an online chat this afternoon at WashingtonPost.com

:Re: Letterman: Listen, Letterman is a comedian. Comedians that don't go over the line are not funny. If you said she looks slutty, that's over the line. If I say it, it's over the line. Why wouldn't Letterman say it - have you been on a plane?

Kathleen Parker: I don't have a problem with raunchy humor, but time and place are everything. In a nightclub, fine. But Letterman is sort of an American institution. It just seems to me that when a woman is running for public office, we should avoid sexualizing her.

Okay, I censored myself before so I'll say it now. I also think it's out of line for a woman to sexualize her candidacy, which Palin did. Just ask Rich Lowry, who wrote that he had to sit up a little straighter when she winked during the vp debate. So, maybe when you play the flirt and invite males to see starbursts bouncing off the walls (Lowry again), then maybe you invite the sexual punchline. I'm wobbling here.

_______________________

Falls Church, Va.: I don't understand why this conversation continues. Don't. Give. Her. Any. More. Ink.

Kathleen Parker: As long as people are throwing money at her - and as long as the GOP treats her as a serious candidate - we're going to cover her.

Alas, I note that the poll featured on the front page of USA Today today doesn't mention Palin as a spokesperson for the GOP. She may be fading already.

I am told by people close to her that Palin and her family would love to turn back the clock to July 2008 . . . and just say "no" to John McCain. That may be the best indicator of her future political ambitions. OTOH, power is an addictive aphrodisiac.

"As long as people are throwing money at her"? It sounds like Parker is calling Palin a whore in so many words. Incredible.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; democrats; enemedia; kathleenparker; letterman; liberalmedia; obamedia; palin; parker; pds; rino; rinoromney; romney; romneyantipalin; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: kristinn

So Parker is siding with Letterman and against somebody’s fourteen year old daughter? Letterman’s joke was tacky by any standard.


61 posted on 06/10/2009 3:01:22 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by governments. You've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Just what if Letterman made a joke about Michelle being a “hoe”?


62 posted on 06/10/2009 3:01:57 PM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Sorry, but I won’t click the link and get any more traffic to her site. I’ve already emailed CBS and given them a piece of my mind.


63 posted on 06/10/2009 3:08:15 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Alas, I note that the poll featured on the front page of USA Today today doesn't mention Palin as a spokesperson for the GOP. She may be fading already.

Who was the "spokesman" for the Democrat Party in June of 1981? Was it Walter Mondale? Of course not! And yet Walter Mondale was the Democrat's Presidential nominee in 1984. How can that be?

Who was the Democrat "spokesman" in June of 1985? Was it Michael Dukakis, the Baby-Guv of Massachusetts? Dukakis was not even on the radar. And yet he was the Democrat nominee in 1988.

Was Bill Clinton on anybody's short list of anything in June of 1989? Sure he had given a nice speech at the DNC the year before, but he was soon forgotten. And was Bob Dole anybody's go-to guy for Republicans in June of 1993? Had anybody even heard of George W. Bush in June of 1997?

Not to belabor the point, but was anybody quoting John Kerry in June of 2001? For that matter, who thought much of the newly minted Junior Senator for Illinois in June of 2005?

The fact that Sarah Palin is not seen as the Voice of the Republican Party at this point is much more a factor in her favor than a factor against her for 2012.

64 posted on 06/10/2009 3:08:25 PM PDT by gridlock (L'Etat, c'est Barack...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What’s amazing is that she really is an obscure Washington Post columnist—not an easy status to achieve!


65 posted on 06/10/2009 3:09:17 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Just so we all remember, Gov. Palin was winking at her father, who was sitting in the audience.

It was perverts on the left who sexualized it and are still trying to preserve it as urban myth.


66 posted on 06/10/2009 3:11:48 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
"Okay, I censored myself before so I'll say it now. I also think it's out of line for a woman to sexualize her candidacy, "

Has there been a Democrat female candidate in the last, oh, fifty years who hasn't sexualized her candidacy? What about the latest Supreme Court nominee?

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

67 posted on 06/10/2009 3:12:02 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

She’s been irrelevant for months. Suddenly she writes an article about Sarah and we’re to notice her again? Seems to me she doesn’t have a career apart from Sarah. Or any use to anyone outside of that commentary. She should be ignored at this point.


68 posted on 06/10/2009 3:16:45 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Gov. Palin is making a terrible mistake. She is allowing herself to be over exposed. There is no up side to poisitve press two years out and all down sides to negative or even neutral press.

Stay in Alaska. Do a GREAT job as governor and when the country is in the toilet in 2012 she will be greeted as a hero.

If she keeps allowing herself to be over exposed and her name batted around weekly, in 2012 she will be seen as just another politician. She will lose that “new comer” “Outside the beltway” glow. Let GZingrich and others keep the spotlight in these out years and return when the time is right.


69 posted on 06/10/2009 3:18:44 PM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurtleUp

Now that photo was 0’s deliberate show of.....something....but I just can’t not for the life of me, figure out what.

I’ve heard about cunning runts. I think this might be.....oh never mind.


70 posted on 06/10/2009 3:25:49 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (The plan... 0 in power for life. At least that's what they told him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I don’t think Obama could’ve won without McCain’s help; Palin is like the siding on a farmer’s barn in Kansas at this point and Parker is one of the people sorting through the rubble where the twister ripped through just hours ago.

The true message from the conservative side before last November was that the voters didn’t really know what they were getting themselves into — now they do.

If they still haven’t learned then I guess it’s time to move to quieter pastures.


71 posted on 06/10/2009 3:35:45 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

These vile, left-wing, Obama-loving blowhards only make Sarah Palin that much more attractive. In light of the Imus flap we can see a blatant double standard at work here.


72 posted on 06/10/2009 3:37:03 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I understood that she winked at her father, who was justifiably very proud of his daughter up there body-slamming Joe “the Gaffer” Biden at the debate.


73 posted on 06/10/2009 3:41:06 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; All
Can you spell, "envious"...?


74 posted on 06/10/2009 3:52:24 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

I hope Todd runs over this Kathleen crone with his snow machine. What a low rent broad.


75 posted on 06/10/2009 3:54:27 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (I voted for Sarah Palin on November 4, 2008. John McCain just happened to be on the ticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The left seems to have no problem with rape as long as the right women are the ones being raped.
76 posted on 06/10/2009 3:59:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Sarah Palin stands between Kathleen Parker and obscurity.
77 posted on 06/10/2009 4:01:42 PM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
I'm guessing that the next line we will be hearing from the Dems that it is Sarah Palin’s fault that Obama was elected. They would been able to vote for McCain if he hadn't chosen Palin as his running mate. It will be Sarah's fault that they had no choice but to vote for Obama.
As the reality of Obama, as opposed to the imaging of Obama, begins to dawn on some of the not-so-leftist of the other side the vitriol slung toward conservatives is going to get nastier and nastier. The left does not admit culpability and anyone who promoted Obama has to deflect responsibility away from themselves and onto the usual demons of the left’s mindset...Sarah and Rush and all of us.
If the left is beginning to have rumblings of buyer's remorse on the choice and championing and deifying of Obama, then they are going to blame conservatives. They will not accept responsibility for their actions. It is a true characteristic of a lefty.
78 posted on 06/10/2009 4:10:46 PM PDT by madinmadtown (Nuclear...better to mispronounce it, than not understand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This. Is. Sick.


79 posted on 06/10/2009 4:13:16 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry
She is allowing herself to be over exposed.

She has spent a grand total of 9 days in the lower 48 since Jan. 1, 2009. 3 of those days were for charity fundraising events, 2 more were for the Evansville right-to-life-dinner and the Down Syndrome event (also fundraising for them).

The media, however, has been focused on her every day of this year. What would you suggest she do, resign her governorship?

80 posted on 06/10/2009 4:13:44 PM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson