To: mbynack
I remember back in the 70s when racial quota systems were allowed I was just thinking the same. I was in high school then. I am now a grandmother.
How many generations does it take to educate a minority?
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
How many generations does it take to educate a minority? There's a racist joke in there somewhere. Wait for it ...
171 posted on
06/29/2009 7:40:42 AM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
To: Uncle Ike
176 posted on
06/29/2009 7:42:11 AM PDT by
Uncle Ike
(Stuck on Stupid)
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
......How many generations does it take to educate a minority? ......
You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink
You can lead a minority to school, but you can’t make him think
180 posted on
06/29/2009 7:43:26 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The boy's war in Detriot has already cost more then the war in Iraq.)
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Sotomayor should not be confirmed.
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
By 2023 half of the children 18 and under will be minorities, as classified by the USG, and by 2042 half of the country will be minorities.
188 posted on
06/29/2009 7:45:28 AM PDT by
kabar
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Merit survives by one vote to fight again another day! Praise God.
193 posted on
06/29/2009 7:49:06 AM PDT by
Theophilus
(Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?)
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Another important aspect of the case that got little publicity is the promotional exams had been developed by a company that specializes in race neutral testing.
200 posted on
06/29/2009 7:54:24 AM PDT by
animal172
(Disgusted in Tennessee)
To: Admin Moderator
This thread is not updating. It is stuck, as well as- I think the rest of FR.
To: In Maryland
As usual, Scalia’s concurring opinion cuts right to the heart of the matter:
“But the war between disparate impact and equal protection will be waged sooner or later, and it behooves us to begin thinking about howand on what termsto make peace between them.”
[Note to Scalia - only one of those is in the Constitution: equal protection. But you knew that!]
Ginsberg's dissent is laughable - talk about considering facts not in evidence! It is so obvious she made a decision first and then tried to find something, anything, to justify it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson