Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Post sells access, White House denies involvement [canceled after being exposed]
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 07/02/2009 9:51:05 AM PDT by RatherBiased.com

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Nervous Tick

Waiting for the “Press programs” on the weekend....All the big wigs are on VACATION this week.


21 posted on 07/02/2009 10:10:41 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I’ll go first ...

long-form BC,
college records

Your turn ...


22 posted on 07/02/2009 10:10:43 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Can’t impugn integrity (stifling a laugh here) that the Post doesn’t have.

But they do have stones. Takes very big ones to say these things with a straight face.


23 posted on 07/02/2009 10:11:18 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

Dont forget he didnt know Air Force One was making a bombing run on New York either.


24 posted on 07/02/2009 10:12:20 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Evidently some of these stupid staffers didn’t realize that this kind of thing has to be conducted “under the table.”

Issue a brochure selling access to power? You’ve got to be kidding.


25 posted on 07/02/2009 10:13:10 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

I know I read an article/thread somewhere about “intimate dinners” already being held at some DC restaurant where all the biggie news media hobnob with administration folks for the same purpose as described here. (Please forgive my inability to provide links;brain freezes take a while to thaw. . .if ever. . .)


26 posted on 07/02/2009 10:13:38 AM PDT by JoyjoyfromNJ (Psalm 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

The Constitutions First Amendment guarantees a free press.

LMAO Now we know it isnt free, they charge for their bias.


27 posted on 07/02/2009 10:13:43 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Got contact information for Helen? I think she and her friends might be up to asking for a couple of answers...I’d start with Kindergartens records... that would anwer a few questions.


28 posted on 07/02/2009 10:13:50 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Liars, Damn Liars and the Washington Post


29 posted on 07/02/2009 10:20:40 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

I would think that WA Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth owes all of us Freepers an “I’m sorry” dinner in some well-appointed, relaxed setting.


30 posted on 07/02/2009 10:22:16 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

WaPo, supporter of the Culture of Corruption.


31 posted on 07/02/2009 10:23:35 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com; BP2; kristinn

Is there a law that’s been broken?

Who would investigate to see if others are doing similar? FBI? CONgress?

Would a FoI request get any e-mails from the WH to the Post?


32 posted on 07/02/2009 10:25:10 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

How could this take place without the participation and advance knowledge of the White House?


33 posted on 07/02/2009 10:27:36 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Welcome to Chicago gangster land.
34 posted on 07/02/2009 10:33:49 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (...and never forget that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

“This should never have happened. The fliers got out and weren’t vetted,” Weymouth told her paper. “They didn’t represent at all what we were attempting to do.”

The farm animals catch the pigs for a change.


35 posted on 07/02/2009 10:35:16 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Ping


36 posted on 07/02/2009 10:39:49 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

Gambling? In here?


37 posted on 07/02/2009 11:10:53 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Here is another potentialmajor scandal that will probably just sink from sight over the 4thof July weekend, just as the Pelosi/CIA story sank over the Memorial Day weekend.

But there is a serious question: is it possible that Obama administration officials and Democratic legislators could NOT have known about the specifics of this arrangement? Is this not yet another example of the media cozying up to the Obama administration, at the home of the WaPost publisher, in a "non-confrontational" environment? Hannity and O'Reilly need to be all over this story.
38 posted on 07/02/2009 11:16:48 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

“White House denies involvement” - well, that settles it, case closed. Let’s move on. This is just a distraction from the serious work that the president is trying to accomplish for the American people.


39 posted on 07/02/2009 11:19:49 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I already said my piece over at #42
40 posted on 07/02/2009 11:47:42 AM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson