Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese baby girls sold for adoption(extra baby seized for failure to pay fine)
UPI ^ | 07/02/09

Posted on 07/04/2009 7:26:46 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Chinese baby girls sold for adoption

Published: July 2, 2009 at 11:55 PM

As many as 80 newborn baby girls from China's southwest Guizhou Province were sold for adoption by foreign parents since 2001, a newspaper probe found.

China Daily, quoting the Southern Metropolis News, said the babies were removed from their families by local officials in the province's Zhenyuan county. Most of them were handed over to foreign adoptive parents as orphans at a price of $3,000 each.

The report said one poor farming couple, who are among the affected 80 families, had to hand over their fifth baby, a girl, to local family planning officials because they couldn't pay the appropriate fine under China's two-child policy.

The report said the husband, like other fathers in the county, wanted and got a boy after three girls. The fifth baby was again a girl as the family struggled to support all five on an annual income of about $732.

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adoption; china; fine; twochildpolicy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
I hope this won't inspire Barry to impose two child quota on those "bitter bible-holding gun-loving" whities.
1 posted on 07/04/2009 7:26:47 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; maui_hawaii; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/04/2009 7:27:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Barry to impose two child quota on those "bitter bible-holding gun-loving" whities.

We basically impose this quota on ourselves. The average birthrate is 1.6 per family.

The less fortunate have more children because they are rewarded by our government.

3 posted on 07/04/2009 7:33:14 AM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Another for the “Chinese are Barbarians” file.


4 posted on 07/04/2009 7:38:59 AM PDT by farmer18th (If you preach "too big to let fail," you're also preaching "too small to let succeed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

>>As many as 80 newborn baby girls from China’s southwest Guizhou Province were sold for adoption by foreign parents since 2001<<

How did foreign parents get Chinese babies to sell?


5 posted on 07/04/2009 7:40:35 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well......thank leftists we have abortion,so we won’t needlessly suffer this kind of atrocity! (/sarc,big time)


6 posted on 07/04/2009 7:41:34 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Time to CLEAN HOUSE (AND Senate!!!) Kick their butts to the curb!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VicVega
The less fortunate have more children because they are rewarded by our government.

Yep...you nailed it!
7 posted on 07/04/2009 7:42:29 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Time to CLEAN HOUSE (AND Senate!!!) Kick their butts to the curb!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I have a bad feeling that Barry is intentionally causing racial unrest in hopes of an uprising so he and the Democrat/Socialist/Progressive/Marxist/Fascists can install Martial Law and finally take over.

I only wonder this because they are treating as terrorists those that have served in our Military.

8 posted on 07/04/2009 7:42:36 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny
Martial law? Let him impose one. He will find out how little territory he can actually control.
9 posted on 07/04/2009 7:48:07 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

“The less fortunate have more children because they are rewarded by our government.”

We have four boys that are healthy, happy and sound. We are not well off financially by any means and we DO NOT rely on any welfare, so there are exceptions.


10 posted on 07/04/2009 7:48:58 AM PDT by mkcc30 ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VicVega; djsherin

In other words, the American government imposes a fine on those who do not have children...they must pay a surcharge, a fee, for the same income as those with kids.

Such tax policies are a way for the government to say, “Do as we say or we’ll fine you.”

The American people have gotten used to a Federal income tax (long ago), and now that they are lulled into deductions, credits, etc., look for this technique of government control to increase.


11 posted on 07/04/2009 7:54:59 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30
We have four boys that are healthy, happy and sound. We are not well off financially by any means and we DO NOT rely on any welfare, so there are exceptions.

My apology for not being clear and no disrespect meant to working families like yourself.

I am trying to be PC.

Maybe I should have wrote, inner city, women having multiple children of different fathers are rewarded and encouraged.

Being PC sucks.

Just too bad more "traditional" families don't have more children.

12 posted on 07/04/2009 7:55:12 AM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
"Federal income tax (long ago), and now that they are lulled into deductions, credits, etc., look for this technique of government control to increase."

No kidding. Foaming at the mouth for my next tax break. A real tax break would be to eliminate the personal income tax all together.

And you are correct, more taxes, fees and VAT's to come.

13 posted on 07/04/2009 7:59:14 AM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

I understood your meaning, absolutely no offense taken. A working family does indeed have no reason to be offended.
I have witnessed from various places I lived the “families” you speak of and have even overheard the conversations about having more children so they could receive more welfare. Sadly there are generations of these people.


14 posted on 07/04/2009 8:04:32 AM PDT by mkcc30 ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

Those little Chinese girls with US passports and a good education will be highly sought after by millionaires in China.


15 posted on 07/04/2009 8:04:37 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee
The less fortunate have more children because they are rewarded by our government.

Perhaps very partially true. Many have more children because they are intent only on having sex and not smart enough to use birth control effectively. The men are intent on making babies and, not having real jobs, don't even consider it part of their responsibility to take care of them. That's womens work.

16 posted on 07/04/2009 8:06:21 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30

I am so glad you are principled and pay your full share of taxes by not claiming that tax exemption government reward for having children!

Nearly all so-called “conservatives” on FR show their true liberal colors by supporting such governmental control measures, rather than standing up and saying that taxing people extra for not having children, a mortgage, etc., is unAmerican.


17 posted on 07/04/2009 8:06:26 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Those little Chinese girls with US passports and a good education will be highly sought after by millionaires in China.

No doubt. In the quest to have sons, China will end up with a 10 to 1 ratio of men to women.

20 years from now you could end up with a big homosexual society. Otherwise come the US and meet the girls, now women that were put up for adoption.

18 posted on 07/04/2009 8:14:50 AM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VicVega
Most Americans are unaware that there was no Federal personal income tax 100 years ago.
19 posted on 07/04/2009 8:16:28 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
So a tax exemption should be refused for children?

Are they not also American citizens or are they just non abortions gone wrong and should be left to die as ObaMao would have it?

Do you take your exemption?

I don't see your reasoning that only some people should have exemptions and other not. Should we have to reach a certain age to have an exemption?

These people that have children and pay taxes are the working people!

20 posted on 07/04/2009 8:22:39 AM PDT by mckenzie7 (TOTUS = PONZI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson