Posted on 07/06/2009 9:32:59 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
I seem to recall some statements along that line.
Meanwhile the USSR almost launched a Mutally Assured Destruction attack on the West on September 26th, 1983 all because of an erronous signal indicating we'd "launched".
Now she can REALLY see Mother Russia from “her home” < /SNL quote attributed to Sarah Palin >
Now Obama. How many have traveled to the US. From what I recall, not too many. It's either they don't want to come to the "mountain" or the "mountain" wants to do the traveling so he can get neat trips on that cool aeroplane and visit the world.
Just how many frequent flyer miles has he wracked up so far in just 6-7 months?
If the Russians DO downsize their arsenal, what are the odds that some of the materials will be spirited out of the nation to foreign powers hostile to the West?
Corruption runs deep. Money talks. All it takes is one subset of the chain of authority to provide a threat to stability.
Missile defence is controversial because the Russian and U.S arsenals are still currently sized to ensure mutually assured destruction.
If you are paranoid and Russian it is easy to see the U.S defensive shield as something that would let the U.S launch a first strike while at the same time stop Russia from retaliating.
Missile defence is controversial because the Russian and U.S arsenals are still currently sized to ensure mutually assured destruction.
If you are paranoid and Russian it is easy to see the U.S defensive shield as something that would let the U.S launch a first strike while at the same time stop Russia from retaliating.
Man oh man.......this is one dumb dude.
Schwing.....look y’all, I waved my magic wand and the Russians have magically changed their lying, deceitful ways.
“It is feared by Russia because they couldnt initiate a first strike that would eliminate a response.”
I know that that is the REAL reason why they oppose missile defense, but I’m wondering how they (or even IF they) attempt to couch their intent in politically acceptable language. To have a known enemy say “we don’t want you to be able to defend yourself so that, if we choose to do so, we will have the ability to wipe you out without consequence,” doesn’t sound very snuggly.
Of all the problems in the world today, the number of nuclear weapons we and the Russians have isn’t ON THE RADAR. Nobody cares anymore, we know we aren’t going to launch ours, and Russia isn’t likely to launch theirs.
Obama is living in the past, trying to solve a non-existant problem from the 70s that Reagan already took care of in the 80s.
What’s next, is he going to solve the problem of the Warsaw Pact expansion?
LOL!
“Reset”, or “Overcharge”?
I guess Hillary’s big red button worked after all!
Obama doesn’t want to touch the issues of:
Nuclear bombs in Pakistan
Nuclear bombs in Iran
Nuclear bombs in North Korea
Nuclear bombs in Communist China
He’s in a job that’s far above his paygrade.
“We have reset U.S.-Russia relations” about in the same regards as Barry suggesting that “the stimulus has done its job”....... =.=
Isn’t resetting something what you do when you want to turn it back into the way it was?
Again he shows his shame at being an American.
Why wouldn’t two people seeking the same goal, Communist domination of the world, agree to that? All they need do is hide the truth from the rest of us.
As usual, we will reduce our arsenal and the Russians will just pretend to do the same just in case we are able to elect a pro-American again.
Probably apologized for our role in the cold war, for standing in the way of the soviets instead of helping them.
Why would Obama consent to meet with the No.2 guy in Russia?
Stupidity?
We're going to need it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.