Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: We have reset U.S.-Russia relations
The Hill ^

Posted on 07/06/2009 9:32:59 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Obama: We have reset U.S.-Russia relations @ 12:18 pm by Jeremy P. Jacobs

President Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev touted the results of the first day of their summit in Moscow at a press conference on Monday.

Both presidents complimented the others' "business-like" approach to the summit and both appeared pleased with the agreements that came out of the first day.

Obama said at the beginning at that shortly after taking office they "resolved to reset U.S.-Russian relations."

"Today, after less than six months," he went on, "we have done exactly that."

In particular, Obama touted the summit's agreements on nuclear proliferation Obama said he hopes to reduce the the U.S. and Russia's nuclear arsenal by about a third.

The press conference did not go off flawlessly, however. Obama stumbled slightly over the pronunciation of Medvedev's name at the beginning of the press conference, though he recovered quickly. The U.S. president also sidestepped a question about who is leading Russia, Medvedev or former president and current prime minister Vladmir Putin. Obama said he trusts Medvedev but said that Medvedev and Putin appear to be "working very well together."

Medvedev characterized the first day of talks as "very open and sincere." He also said that Russia and the U.S. has "many points of convergence and many points of mutual interest."

The Russian president also said that the two leaders discussed Afghanistan at length, as well as developments in the Middle East. Obama added later that they also had conversations about relations with North Korea and Iran.

"On the whole, characterizing the first day of work," Medvedev said, "I would like to say that I view them as the first and very important step in the process of improving full scale cooperation between our two countries."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; asocialistamerica; bhonukes; bhorussia; bhovisit; coldwar; coldwarii; globalstability; obama; obamaclaims; obamunism; procommunist; sovietreunion; ussa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: agooga
Is it opposed by Russia because they fear that an Eastern European nation under the umbrella might have first strike capability without fear of missile retaliation?

I seem to recall some statements along that line.

Meanwhile the USSR almost launched a Mutally Assured Destruction attack on the West on September 26th, 1983 all because of an erronous signal indicating we'd "launched".

41 posted on 07/06/2009 10:02:09 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

42 posted on 07/06/2009 10:03:26 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

Now she can REALLY see Mother Russia from “her home” < /SNL quote attributed to Sarah Palin >


43 posted on 07/06/2009 10:03:52 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I remember when Bush was elected the first time, leaders from all over the world traveled to the USA to meet with him.

Now Obama. How many have traveled to the US. From what I recall, not too many. It's either they don't want to come to the "mountain" or the "mountain" wants to do the traveling so he can get neat trips on that cool aeroplane and visit the world.

Just how many frequent flyer miles has he wracked up so far in just 6-7 months?

44 posted on 07/06/2009 10:03:53 AM PDT by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

If the Russians DO downsize their arsenal, what are the odds that some of the materials will be spirited out of the nation to foreign powers hostile to the West?

Corruption runs deep. Money talks. All it takes is one subset of the chain of authority to provide a threat to stability.


45 posted on 07/06/2009 10:05:40 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pburgh01

46 posted on 07/06/2009 10:07:16 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: agooga

Missile defence is controversial because the Russian and U.S arsenals are still currently sized to ensure mutually assured destruction.

If you are paranoid and Russian it is easy to see the U.S defensive shield as something that would let the U.S launch a first strike while at the same time stop Russia from retaliating.


47 posted on 07/06/2009 10:09:36 AM PDT by Angostura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: agooga

Missile defence is controversial because the Russian and U.S arsenals are still currently sized to ensure mutually assured destruction.

If you are paranoid and Russian it is easy to see the U.S defensive shield as something that would let the U.S launch a first strike while at the same time stop Russia from retaliating.


48 posted on 07/06/2009 10:10:21 AM PDT by Angostura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Man oh man.......this is one dumb dude.

Schwing.....look y’all, I waved my magic wand and the Russians have magically changed their lying, deceitful ways.


49 posted on 07/06/2009 10:10:31 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“It is feared by Russia because they couldn’t initiate a first strike that would eliminate a response.”

I know that that is the REAL reason why they oppose missile defense, but I’m wondering how they (or even IF they) attempt to couch their intent in politically acceptable language. To have a known enemy say “we don’t want you to be able to defend yourself so that, if we choose to do so, we will have the ability to wipe you out without consequence,” doesn’t sound very snuggly.


50 posted on 07/06/2009 10:13:47 AM PDT by agooga (Struggling every day to be worthy of their sacrifice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Of all the problems in the world today, the number of nuclear weapons we and the Russians have isn’t ON THE RADAR. Nobody cares anymore, we know we aren’t going to launch ours, and Russia isn’t likely to launch theirs.

Obama is living in the past, trying to solve a non-existant problem from the 70s that Reagan already took care of in the 80s.

What’s next, is he going to solve the problem of the Warsaw Pact expansion?


51 posted on 07/06/2009 10:16:29 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

LOL!

“Reset”, or “Overcharge”?

I guess Hillary’s big red button worked after all!


52 posted on 07/06/2009 10:18:42 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Obama doesn’t want to touch the issues of:
Nuclear bombs in Pakistan
Nuclear bombs in Iran
Nuclear bombs in North Korea
Nuclear bombs in Communist China

He’s in a job that’s far above his paygrade.


53 posted on 07/06/2009 10:23:46 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“We have reset U.S.-Russia relations” about in the same regards as Barry suggesting that “the stimulus has done its job”....... =.=


54 posted on 07/06/2009 10:25:51 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Isn’t resetting something what you do when you want to turn it back into the way it was?


55 posted on 07/06/2009 10:28:00 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Again he shows his shame at being an American.


56 posted on 07/06/2009 10:34:12 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why wouldn’t two people seeking the same goal, Communist domination of the world, agree to that? All they need do is hide the truth from the rest of us.

As usual, we will reduce our arsenal and the Russians will just pretend to do the same just in case we are able to elect a pro-American again.


57 posted on 07/06/2009 10:41:53 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Probably apologized for our role in the cold war, for standing in the way of the soviets instead of helping them.


58 posted on 07/06/2009 10:46:10 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why would Obama consent to meet with the No.2 guy in Russia?

Stupidity?


59 posted on 07/06/2009 10:50:47 AM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Missle Defense will not survive these talks. But we can look forward to cheaper vodka.

We're going to need it.

60 posted on 07/06/2009 10:52:27 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson