Posted on 07/10/2009 11:07:33 AM PDT by seanmerc
WASHINGTON -- It’s not news when the White House tries to manage the news. That has always been the case.
But it is news when Obama administration officials -- the folks who proclaimed that they would bring unprecedented openness and transparency to government -- fall all over themselves trying to manipulate news briefings and attempting amateurish stagecraft at public meetings.
The president relies on a list of handpicked reporters to call on at his formal news conferences -- and the fortunate few are not necessarily accredited reporters but include new age self-appointed journalists or anyone with a laptop.
The White House staff selects both the professionals and ringers for the call-on list. Some are alerted the night before the news conference that they will be called on. This leaves the impression that the White House is trying to influence the questions the president will be asked-- which may or may not be true.
At his most recent news conference, President Barack Obama recognized a blogger, who had been invited by the Obama staff to attend the briefing and then steered into asking a question about the Iranian election, a topic that Obama was eager to address. I’ve heard of planted questions, but this was a planted questioner, an odd addition to the medley of White House feints designed to manipulate the news.
With the White House pulling all the strings, reporters become their puppets. Those not called upon -- well, they are nothing but props or extras at the big show in the East Room of the White House.
The Obama administration, like many of its predecessors, also has adopted the so-called "town meeting" format to give the president a forum that allows him to market the party line without appearing to do so. Access is limited and questioners are carefully selected so that viewers and readers get the purest form of the president’s message, whatever the topic may be.
Spin and propaganda do eventually become transparent, but sometimes the deception can lead to unjustified war -- as we have seen in the recent past. It’s as if the message managers become deceived by their own spin.
All of this is particularly unfortunate at a time when the nation needs a free and unfettered news media to scrutinize the new administration and its new policies.
The military keeps us safe but the press -- which informs the American people -- keeps us free.
The importance of a free press is best illustrated by its prominence on the to-do list of would-be dictators. The first move by coup supporters is to seize the news media, take over the local broadcast stations and censor the newspapers.
In the U.S. the term "managed news" was coined in the Kennedy era, giving a handy title to a practice that previous presidents had also attempted. Perhaps this practice reached its high water mark during the Ronald Reagan administration when the former Hollywood actor and Michael Deaver, his deputy chief of staff, collaborated to meticulously construct the president’s image. It seemed that not a Reagan wave went unscripted.
Much as White Houses try to control the news, it’s not that easy in a free society.
I think of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s attempt to set up a "disinformation" office at the Pentagon. When it was quickly exposed and dismantled, Rumsfeld indicated he would spread out the bogus news operations to other agencies of the military.
It’s a shame that the Obama administration has discarded his high-sounding rhetoric about transparency and openness. So far, it looks like change we can’t believe in.
I’d like to take credit for that line, but I can’t. I stole it from someone else—it cracked me up!
To put that in perspective, she was 21 years old when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.
The new fangled invention, T.V. was still a decade away.
You would think after seeing all that see has seen, she would at least be a moderate journalist instead of a raving moonbat
Well Michelle Obama is no looker either Jeff. I wish this cave crawler would go back to her cave. Sheesh!! CO
Wow, all three of those women in that photo are “rather plain” and all have substantial noses. Have I said that delicately enough?
Giggle. Yes, that was rather delicately put.
Also, I believe that, back then, it was considered disrespectful to have your hands in your pockets when talking to an adult. All in all, I’d say that fine young man has got Hellen’s number.
I think you are correct on both points ;)
I don’t know how my daughters are going to sift through the sissies of today and find a manly guy...
Not to worry, my nephew is no sissy boy. There must be many others out there.
I don’t know, I’ll ask the poster.
Who is the attractive woman you put in posting #29?
don't know, but she's a real looker....
I was surfin' FR, found that photo. 
Except for Helen’s comments about Reagan and Rummy, she’s right on target. She’s not backing down at all. Gotta give her credit when it’s due. Actually, she’s quite brave.
LOL - true
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.