Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Also at: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2009/07/hopeless_gop_ho.html#comments
1 posted on 07/13/2009 11:34:57 AM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: JSDude1

All this manuvering baloney.

“We want to oppose but we don’t want to piss off hispanics.”

Take a stand and forget the posturing.


32 posted on 07/13/2009 12:00:30 PM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

The GOP is pointless beyond measure.


34 posted on 07/13/2009 12:04:03 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

And they wonder why I tell them ‘no money’?

The last few calls I’ve gotten - from both the RNC & McCain - were pretty hostile. When someone wants you to donate, and they start shouting at you...it is a good sign they are hearing the same message over and over.


38 posted on 07/13/2009 12:12:13 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG THEM?! Since she has said she will judge in an UNCONSTITIONAL MANNER, it should be 40 NO VOTES??!!!!


45 posted on 07/13/2009 12:34:51 PM PDT by MrDem (Monthly Special: Will write OPUS's for Whiners and Crybabies for no charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Sotomayor is a done deal and long has been.


48 posted on 07/13/2009 12:38:00 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
Many Republicans said they viewed 23 "no" votes as a benchmark, because that would be one more than Chief Justice John Roberts received in 2005 and would reflect a significant protest vote

Not this Republican. You don't challenge this mental midget and identity politics baffoon from getting on the court, you will pay. And no 23 votes against is not a challenge.

49 posted on 07/13/2009 12:38:32 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1; All

The snippet of the article reflects EVERYTHING wrong with this country today.


58 posted on 07/13/2009 12:54:26 PM PDT by TheZMan ("I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

At Sonia Sotomayor hearing, Republicans are surprisingly tough
Politico | July 13, 2009 | Josh Gerstein
Posted on 07/13/2009 11:54:35 AM PDT by Zakeet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2291649/posts


68 posted on 07/13/2009 1:48:01 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Is this for real??? Now 20 NO votes is a victory??? WTF is going on when losing by a landslide vote is considered a victory. We are so screwed by these idiots it’s not even funny anymore.


69 posted on 07/13/2009 1:56:29 PM PDT by RedneckReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Note to GOP: VOTE AGAINST SOTOMAYOR.

Since when does the GOP or any Republican for that matter care about the Hispanic voter. We lost the Hispanic block this past election and don’t seem to care.

How is voting against Sotomayor’s nomination gonna seem anymore “uncaring” to the Hispanic population than the GOP already does. Honestly.

It’s absolutely amazing anyone would vote for this racist to be confirmed to the Supreme Court.

What a complete joke.


70 posted on 07/13/2009 2:28:05 PM PDT by 08bil98z24 (WOD + Law Enforcement = Govt Revenue $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Obama will win this one. She will be confirmed.

Forget it and move on to the battles where we really need to focus our energies . . . defeating Obamacare and Cap & Trade. Let’s not get distracted over something that is inevitable.


71 posted on 07/13/2009 2:42:53 PM PDT by BAW (Fire David Letterman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

And we are supposed to take comfort in 20 “No” votes and continue funding the GOP? I don’t think so.


73 posted on 07/13/2009 7:04:10 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
GOP Looks for at Least 20 'No' Votes

So is their intent to send a message? Or to show just how impotent the GOP is in the Senate? Because keeping only half your members in the fold is hardly something to crow about.

74 posted on 07/13/2009 7:06:06 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

“Others said that if the Senate GOP were to split roughly in half, that would signal support to conservatives who oppose Judge Sotomayor without angering Hispanic voters with a wholesale dismissal of her nomination.”

Too much in that sentence that disturbs me. You don’t vote on a nomination based on who you piss off. You vote based upon your principles and convictions. Too much politics these days that has gotten us into the trouble we are in now. That is what is wrong with the GOP...they worry more about how they will be perceived than actually voting on their principles.

I’m almost through with the GOP for good.


79 posted on 07/13/2009 7:54:54 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Let the purging of the RINOs begin in 2010. - MissouriConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson