Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor Calls Roe Abortion Case "Settled Law"
LifeNews.com ^ | July 14, 2009 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/14/2009 12:50:05 PM PDT by julieee

Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor Calls Roe Abortion Case "Settled Law"

Washington, DC -- Everyone watching the Senate hearings for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor knew the question about abortion case law would come eventually. When it did, Sotomayor gave the answer most political observers expected -- that the Roe v. Wade abortion case is "settled law."

http://www.LifeNews.com/nat5218.html

(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: roeabortioncase; soniasotomayor; supremecourt

1 posted on 07/14/2009 12:50:07 PM PDT by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee
It's settled until it's unsettled.
2 posted on 07/14/2009 12:52:03 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Dred Scott was once settled law. But today we’re not allowed to even think like that.


3 posted on 07/14/2009 12:52:35 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It's settled until it's unsettled.

Next, ask her what she thinks about Heller vs DC.

4 posted on 07/14/2009 12:53:57 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Settled until the upcoming civil war. We’ll get all the states with resources and productive citizenry, and the left can get the welfare folks in CA, NY, etc.


5 posted on 07/14/2009 12:59:38 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

And Heller?


6 posted on 07/14/2009 1:00:31 PM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

So was 3/5 of a man ...


7 posted on 07/14/2009 1:00:57 PM PDT by TexGuy (If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee; E. Pluribus Unum; Auntie Dem; Pearls Before Swine; Da Coyote; BlueNgold; TexGuy

Here’s the shocking truth:

December 2, 2005; Posted: 3:16 p.m. EST (20:16 GMT)
(CNN) — Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito had a private meeting with the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday as he sought to reassure lawmakers that he would respect legal precedent on abortion rights and put his personal views aside.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/02/specter.alito/

Sept. 13, 2005
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee John Roberts said Tuesday that the landmark 1973 ruling legalizing abortion was “settled as a precedent of the court” as he was immediately pressed to address the divisive issue on the second day of his confirmation hearings.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/13/103353.shtml


8 posted on 07/14/2009 1:11:41 PM PDT by donna ( I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth. - Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem

So was Plessy v. Ferguson. Hmm, seems to me like “settled law”, when in conflict with human nature and human rights, eventually gets settled in the other direction.


9 posted on 07/14/2009 1:17:23 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (We're stuck in the "all of the people, some of the time" phase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
<>We’ll get all the states with resources and productive citizenry, and the left can get the welfare folks in CA, NY, etc.

And we don't take IOUs.

10 posted on 07/14/2009 1:21:41 PM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Exactly.


11 posted on 07/14/2009 1:22:39 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donna

I get that - and I understand there is to be a deference given to previous decisions and precedents of the court...

But her statement on the 2nd seem to be at odds with Heller - where is her deference there?


12 posted on 07/14/2009 1:32:47 PM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

All I know is the Supreme Court still wants to kill babies and in so doing the Court has killed the country.


13 posted on 07/14/2009 3:13:40 PM PDT by donna ( I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth. - Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: julieee

14 posted on 07/15/2009 8:41:47 AM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson