Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sessions: GOP Won't Block Vote on Sotomayor Nomination
The Washington Post ^ | July 16, 2009 | Robert Barnes, Amy Goldstein, and Paul Kane

Posted on 07/16/2009 1:40:15 PM PDT by EveningStar

Judge Sonia Sotomayor ended four days of testimony this afternoon with prospects of rapid confirmation to the Supreme Court improved, as a conservative Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee edged toward endorsing her and the panel's ranking Republican said the GOP would not block a vote on her nomination.

Shortly before the committee concluded its questioning of Sotomayor, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the panel's senior GOP member, told Sotomayor he would "look forward to you getting that vote" by the time the Senate takes its annual summer break, slated to begin Aug. 7.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 111th; jeffsessions; scotus; sessions; soniasotomayor; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Sarah Barracuda

did they just get really stupid?


21 posted on 07/16/2009 1:50:00 PM PDT by rahbert ("...but Rush....but Rush...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

That would have been great. But since he chose the path he did, he maybe picked up two votes but lost so many more.

Really time to purge the GOP or just form another party.

Its one party with two logos.


22 posted on 07/16/2009 1:50:19 PM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I’m not surprised. Sessions also voted to confirm Eric Holder.


23 posted on 07/16/2009 1:50:34 PM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

No...they don’t have “two” of anything!


24 posted on 07/16/2009 1:51:09 PM PDT by my small voice (A biased media and an uneducated public is the biggest threat to our democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
RIP GOP.

They are SO pathetic it would be an embarrassment to be associated with them.

They must, for some unknown reason, think they are doing something that I'll approve of since my phone has been ringing off the wall every evening with their solicitations. I just tell them that I would sooner donate to the Democrats as to give $ to them since the Democrats stab me in the front, not the back.

25 posted on 07/16/2009 1:52:08 PM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

“The GOP can’t stop the nomination, so why bother holding it up..”

Simple.

You remember that thing we had about 30 years ago called the Korean conflict? And how we failed to achieve victory? How come we didn’t cross the 38th parallel and push those rice-eaters back to the Great Wall of China?

Then take the f*ing wall apart brick by brick and nuke them back into the f*ing stone age forever?

Tell me why! How come? Say it! Say it!

All right. I’ll say it. ‘Cause Truman was too much of a *pussy wimp* to let MacArthur go in there and blow out those Commie bastards!

Sorry I got a little carried away :)


26 posted on 07/16/2009 1:52:38 PM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Sounds like it time for Alabama to Retire another senator.


27 posted on 07/16/2009 1:53:03 PM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
DO NOT SEND THE GOP ANOTHER PENNY! Why keep funding these wimpy fools. They are worthless and we need to focus on a conservative political alternative.
28 posted on 07/16/2009 1:53:56 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Sell out. Another tainted hearing.


29 posted on 07/16/2009 1:54:02 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Not the nominee worth blocking. A lib (Souter) for a lib (Sotomayor).


30 posted on 07/16/2009 1:55:07 PM PDT by Carling ("We've lost two people in my family because you dickheads won't cut trees down," - Warwick Spooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
The GOP can't stop the nomination

You have just summarized the problem.

The Supreme Court is critical to freedom. Once it falls to the Left, America, as we know it will quickly be destroyed and with life terms, they will long outlast this and the next few administrations. This was the battle and the GOP didn;t even bother to fight. Screw them.

NOT ONE MORE PENNY TO THESE FOOLS. CUT THEM OFF!!!!!

31 posted on 07/16/2009 1:56:55 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
Just a tacit admission that they didn't have the votes to stop her nomination. They don't even have the votes to filibuster (not that they'd have the courage to do that under any circumstances anyway).

IMO, the only possible value to dragging this inevitable confirmation out is to provide the people a teachable moment. The Republicans have decided not to do this, either.

I know I'll draw fire for this, but 0 was elected, and under the constitution he has the right to nominate who he wants for the SC, unless they are clearly unfit. Senate advice and consent was meant by the founders to determine fitness, not reject on the basis of ideological differences. That's why Dems were wrong to derail Bork, Estrada, almost derail Thomas, et. al., and it would be equally wrong for Reps, if they could, to derail Sotomayor on the same basis.

This is just replacing a lib with another lib. Doesn't change the makeup of the SC at all. Frankly, at this moment in time, Republicans have a lot more important things to do than obstruct this nomination: namely, continue to educate everyone on what kind of socialist hellhole "paradise" 0 is trying his best to turn us into ASAP. I for one would rather see them stay focused on this big picture.

32 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:04 PM PDT by Emile ("In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind" -- Louis Pasteur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

No, the GOP is skipping the first battle line.

That is, the seven GOP members can block this nomination by all voting no to release the nominee for a vote. To release a name requires one yes vote from the minority party.

If they stuck together and did that,Sotomayor would not get a vote. Gee, just like some of Bush’s nominees.

Then the Dems would change the rules of the Committee. So what? They are bullies, they will change the rules until they get the result they want.

But that doesn’t mean we should just give them what they want.

In eight years of Bush’s Presidency the Dems fought EVERY DAY for their side, constantly forcing issues.

The GOP just rolls over and expects us to pull the lever for them.

It is the job of Committee to only allow qualified nominees to get to a full vote.

Sotomayor is not qualified, not even for her present job.

If this horrible nominee can lie, dissemble, show herself to be a mental midget and still get a full vote, what is the point of any Republican showing up?

If the roles were reversed, no Dem would hesitate to vote no and bottle up her name in Committee.

The GOP better reach down and find their balls, because in six weeks there won’t be an America and the GOP will REALLY be irrelevant.


33 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:43 PM PDT by exit82 (Sarah Palin is President No. 45. Get behind her, GOP, or get out of the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

GOP leadership is looking for their gonads with both hands and a mirror and finding nothing!!! They’re eunuchs; impotent and disgusting.


34 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:44 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
They were too scared to even mention her La Raza membership. No Chamber for Frightened Old Men They all need to resign. Every last one of them.

I agree.

This woman is a racist, a bigot, and not much of a lawyer. Then again, so is the nominator...

35 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:45 PM PDT by backhoe (All across America, the Lights are going out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I thought she would probably end up getting 69 votes for confirmation, but after this nonsense from Sessions, I think the number will be closer to 89.

Is there not one conservative and patriot remaining among the Republicans in the Senate?


36 posted on 07/16/2009 1:57:58 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
The disadvantage of having someone like Sotomayor on the USSC is she is so terribly stupid and could probably do harm.

At the same time she's a one-woman show for advocates of some serious USSC reform ~

Odds are good Ruthy is going to poison her morning coffee first thing though.

37 posted on 07/16/2009 1:58:22 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
No you didn't you are absolutely correct. The Left understands scorched Earth and how to win. The GOP are pussies. NOT ONE MORE PENNY FOR THESE FOOLS!
38 posted on 07/16/2009 1:58:33 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
could probably do harm.

Will absolutely do harm. Remember Roe v. Wade? How much harm has that one decision cost the USA?

39 posted on 07/16/2009 1:59:24 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

And I thought little Jeff Session had a set of testacles.

Maybe he did once upon a time, but I think too many years of wearing tight pants made by Democrats has taken them away.

Either conservatives need to push maggots like the GOP Judiciary queens out of office, or go off and start our own party.

I think I have to go now. I have to compose that letter to the GOP in response to the 223rd solicitiation from them for contributions.

From now on only conservatives and the NRA get my money.


40 posted on 07/16/2009 1:59:39 PM PDT by ZULU (God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson