Posted on 07/19/2009 1:38:50 PM PDT by SJackson
Observation: Is There A Pro Israel Mole In White House Or The Radical American Jewish Groups?
Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 19 July 2009
There are two possible explanations for the gift the Obama team gave to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu when, by specifically raising their objection to Jewish ownership of a building in the heart of Jerusalem, they succeeded in rallying all but the radical Israeli politicians to support Netanyahu's stance. That's including the support of the opposition Kadima Party:
Explanation number one: The team in the White House, along with the representatives of American Jewish radical groups such as J Street and American Friends of Peace Now are so clueless about Israeli society on the one hand and so excited by the process of turning the screws on Netayahu that they let their hormones get the best of them and just went too far.
Explanation number two: There is a pro-Israel mole in either the White House or in the radical American Jewish groups with close ties to the Obama team that is deliberately giving advice and direction that the mole knows will result in strengthening Netanyahu.
A mole?
Giving them too much credit.
The odds are its the hormones.
And who can blame them?
After the White House meeting last Monday with American Jewish leaders they were lusting for more of the same.
Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis) (Mail POB 982 Kfar Sava) Tel 972-9-7604719/Fax 972-3-7255730 INTERNET ADDRESS: imra@netvision.net.il Website: http://www.imra.org.il
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Third choice, the United States is being run by a diplomatic incompetant, his two top advisors, Axelrod and Emanuel, no more experience than he. But he sure can read a teleprompter.
Fourth Choice: He is totally controlled by George Soros who is calling the shots.
Or, there really is a God, and humanity is utterly impotent when it opposes his plans.
There are Jewish moles in the white house, but they are Jewish commie moles that would sell Israel off the map if it would help build their legacy.
The problem with Islam is that when they conquer territory, no matter the century or who was there before, they believe forever that it is theirs.
Perhaps, but they're not moles
Spot on.
I agree that Jews like Rahm Emmanuel and David Axelrod would sell Israel off the map, but it would be inappropriate to call them "moles" because a "mole" by definition is an infiltrator working against the interests of his apparent colleagues. In this case, these Jews obviously fit in well ideologically with their anti-Israel buddies in the Administration.
I don’t even get that. What? He’s so in he’s out? He’s so dumb he’s smart? I think Obama wants to get rid of Israel. That is the way he envisions true peace.
And even if there were a "pro-Israel mole," I don't believe it would be Emmanuel.
There’s a pro-Hamas mole in the White House.
His name is Barry Soetoro.
And his cover identity is “Barack Hussein Obama.”
Perhaps they can be called descendants of Jewish Commie Moles: Who is David Axelrod (excerpts from this link)
David’s Mother And Radical Leftist Journalism
Myril Axelrod was formerly a writer for PM a leftist tabloid newspaper published from 1940 to 1948 in New York City.
A feature on the leftist nature of PM was publisished by City Journal in the Summer of 1993.
The paper was founded by Ralph McAllister Ingersoll, a liberal who thought he could use Communists on his staff to help with the circulation of the paper. The Communists, however, used the paper for their own purposes and he lost influence over the magazine after entering the Army.
In fact, in 1946 five of the staff members of PM’s Washington, DC bureau resigned in protest over the high level of Communist influence within the newspaper. The five resigned after three other members of the staff were fired. According to the five who resigned:
Although not himself a Communist, he [Ralph Ingersoll] has continuously yielded to Communist pressure and has denounced as factionalists those staff members who have tried to keep the party line out of the paper. He has destroyed the confidence of those who believe that PM should be as realistic and critical of Russian foreign policy as in its evaluation of the foreign policy of our own government. (New York Times, June 15, 1946)
The staff was comprised of both Communists and non-Communist liberals. The paper was overtly political and the writers didn’t hide their political biases in their writings. Ingersoll refused to carry advertising because he didn’t want the paper to be influenced by advertisers. City Journal writer Roger Starr noted: “Although every member of PM’s staff was profoundly anti-Hitler, the staff was divided into two cliques: the liberals who regarded the Soviet Union as a slave state, devoid of individual rights, and the liberals who regarded the Soviet Union as a living demonstration of a truly humane society.”
For example, Leo Huberman, a Communist sympathizer, was the labor news editor. I.F. Stone was the Washington, DC correspondent for PM. In the 1980s, a KGB agent fingered Stone as a willing participant in Soviet intelligence operations in the U.S.
The paper, however, was never a financial success without advertising. It received funding from Marshall Field III, a leftist millionaire who kept the paper running for eight years. Field also funded the Industrial Areas Foundation, a training school for radical leftist organizers, which was headed by Saul Alinsky. (Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were trained by Alinsky radicals in Chicago).
Former Communist Eugene Lyons, writing in The Red Decade: The Stalinist Penetration of America, noted that PM’s staff included a former editor of the Daily Worker; another was former editor of The Communist; and a third was a leader of the Communist Youth League; a fourth was a Soviet government official; and a fifth was the former staff cartoonist for the Daily Worker, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, USA.
We have been unable to determine if Axelrod’s mother was a liberal who considered the Soviet Union a slave state or a Marxist-leaning liberal who viewed the Soviet Union as a humane society. The fact remains, however, that her liberalism was obviously infused into the mind of David Axelrod and is what still apparently motivates him to support leftist candidates. (end of excerpt)
And I think it’s hormones, too, that contribute to this bashing of Israel by Obama and so so many of his staff.
but they are Jewish commie moles that would sell Israel off the map especially if it would help sell America off the map.
Thanks justiceseeker93.
Fifth choice.
Obama, Rahmbo, and Axelrod are so blinded by hubris that they believe they can do anything including overthrowing Netanyahu. They failed to read the basic Israeli mood - utter distrust of any concessions in the name of “peace.”
Thanks for that info.
The guy looks like Hitler. Is that deliberate?
That’s a good one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.