Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
The mostly pro-Obama television and newspaper/magazine media had to be given an excuse and cover for their collective decision to dismiss or ignore the substantial questions about whether Obama met the qualifications for the office set forth in Article II section I of the Constitution.

And those reporters and editors who were not in the tank for Obama had to be deceived. After Labor Day the swing voters would begin to pay attention to the Presidential campaign.

The truth had to be killed. And with its lie about “how it examined and photographed the original birth certificate“, FactCheck.org killed it.)

13 posted on 07/26/2009 7:38:22 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


In 1961 if a 17 year old American girl gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the “natural born” citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.

In 1961, the year that Barack Obama was born, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to Barack Obama.

15 posted on 07/26/2009 7:40:39 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

FactCheck.org was started with funds from Annanberg?? Trust, which was handled by Ayers and Obama was it not?
That’s like asking the Black panthers to validate Farrakhan, if I got right org. that started or funded it.


17 posted on 07/26/2009 7:45:21 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I always thought his last visit to his ailing grandmother was to silence her before she got conscience at the end and said something damaging about him to someone. I know it sounds silly.


40 posted on 07/26/2009 8:11:40 PM PDT by Melian ("An unexamined life is not worth living." ~Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

You can be sure that if Obama were republican and a conservative, DAN RATHER would be all over this story like a bad smell....


65 posted on 07/26/2009 8:44:59 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Then a very interesting question is who set up, controlled and directed Fact Check. It seems to have been the Pew interests but are any Pew family members involved or was it someone else, and, given the close connections historically of the One via Ayers with the Pew foundation operations, who specifically was involved in the deception?


139 posted on 07/27/2009 6:49:56 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson