Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Great summery on why global warming is a poorly understood science that needs to be further studied before we tax ourselves into a depression.
1 posted on 07/28/2009 11:44:31 PM PDT by FredDardick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FredDardick; Genesis defender; proud_yank; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 07/28/2009 11:46:21 PM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick
"currently in a state known as solar minimum; the lowest energy output by the sun as it oscillates through an approximate 11 year cycle of activity, also known as the Schwabe cycle. This is the primary reason for the colder than normal temperatures recorded across the country this summer."

There was some global warming nutcase on the news today saying that this cool spell is only local in this area (North Dakota, central Canada) and that the rest of the world is still getting hotter. Of course there was no one in the media to ask why the global temperature averages don't agree with his statement.

3 posted on 07/28/2009 11:51:42 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick

If the globull warming crowd can ignore the solar minimum, just wait until we hit the solar maximum!


5 posted on 07/29/2009 12:57:46 AM PDT by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick
The great irony here is it is entirely possible that President Obama and congressional Democrats will impose massive new energy taxes on the nation in a misguided effort to combat global warming, while at the same time the earth is barreling towards another little ice age.

It's not ironic government, and particularly Democrats, are always slow, both mentally and politically.

Al Gore is profiting more than many Wall Street executives from global warming. Gore is getting panic stricken that global cooling will be recognized before the Cap and Trade bill is enacted. I wonder how many other member of Congress have their fingers in this pot.

6 posted on 07/29/2009 1:13:43 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick
Correction :

Great summery on why global warming is a poorly understood science that needs to be further studied before we tax ourselves into oblivion.

There now, fixed.
7 posted on 07/29/2009 1:17:30 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; SideoutFred; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

FReepmail me to get on or off

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


Milankovich, Maunder...
8 posted on 07/29/2009 3:37:55 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick

The great question for the age: When does algore get so fat that he reaches his “tipping point”. When that happens (and it will) the result won’t be pretty, kids.


11 posted on 07/29/2009 5:15:47 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick
One good measure of a model's ability to predict the future is its ability to 'predict' the past. That is, assume it is 1880, and then predict the temperatures in 2009. If sunspot activity is included in the 'prediction', the models can be quite accurate in not only 'predicting' 2009 temperatures, but also the heating and cooling trends that happened in between.

The problem for the Warmists is that there is no residual warming left over to attribute to CO2. That is, virtually all of the temperature anomalies can be explained without including CO2 in the model. When CO2 is included, the models are no longer accurate. That leaves the Warmists with the only option to deny that sunspots are a factor.

13 posted on 07/29/2009 6:02:55 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredDardick
Yup, still no sunspots: http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/sunspots/
20 posted on 07/29/2009 7:28:13 AM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

additional:

NASA now saying that a Dalton Minimum repeat is possible
Watts Up With That? | Jul 28, 2009 | David Archibald
Posted on 07/29/2009 11:20:53 AM PDT by decimon
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2303765/posts


22 posted on 07/29/2009 2:37:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
additional.
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

23 posted on 07/29/2009 2:40:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson