Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Iow, you have no earthly idea why he removed the photo. You are just making it up.
Take it or leave it. You know my motto. I REPORT YOU DECIDE.
The two sets of images exist, they are the same children. You’ve really had enough attention from me, I value my time.
Nor are you here to see how nonsensical your ‘deductions’ about the heritage of these two little boys is. Siblings look v different from ea other all the time. It’s called genetics. According to you, I & my sister couldn’t possibly be related; one of us is fair & the other dark. When was one of us switched for deep, dark nefarious reasons? Where is the ‘real’ sister right now, & why is she there?? Should my ‘fake’ sister & I not dare to post pics of ourselves on the web, for fear someone will notice we’re not really siblings?
& the biggest question of all: have you really no idea how nuts this all is?
Name that movie:
Watson: Moriarty knows... I’m am the only match for his evil genius.
Holmes: You mean he’s not trying to kill me?
Watson: Of course not. He knows you’re an idiot.
Watching a certain troll at work putting out tasty fake insinuations and shell game baby pictures intended to seduce sincere newbie FReepers into a delusional cult is like watching a pedophile grooming unsuspecting kids on the playground. Pretty disgusting, IMO.
IIRC, that was actually the ValMal thread, and the entire thread got pulled (temporarily, and then reinstated). Reason: Flamewar.
If it’s too difficult for you to grasp, leave it alone and let others make up their own minds.
Re: Top center and top right pix in that group....
Head shapes are different, the two right ones have a rectangular face, jaw and temples same width,
and the other has an oval face, with chin way narrower than the temples.
Is that really the best you’ve got? Really?
If you’ve never seen the movie I referenced you should give it a look. Definitely worth the time.
And the article pix show Mark and 0 look very similar.
Note to all: go to the link, don’t post em here; they are Getty images which can’t be posted here :0
Watch out-—Brown Deer will call you a “liar” without proof saying that.. well, mabe not.. “Why would Madeline leave 1/2 million bank stocks to Ruths baby?” Baby David (barry) was ruths child, how is he related to madeline?—thx
Especially when they start out posting half of one and half of another and ask about it.
Their knickers are knotted because it scares them. Their safe little world in which the puppet-leader of the fraud carried out against America was the son of Frank Marshall Davis and a girl who posed for exotic images when she was 15 and still in high school, and for whom the KGB paid for a ticket to fly to Mobasa and back to hide her liason with an ugly old black man older than even her own father, that world has a huge crack in it now, they don’t know who the father and mother of zero is any more. It’s enough to make anyone scream PHOTOSHOP, isn’t it? Oh boy, if only the truth were that easy to cover up. But it’s not. Ask the author of ‘Dreams’ how many mistakes he made. Lots.
Harsh, yet apt. It is quintessential cult-like behavior, & that is never pretty to watch.
I’m still trying to figure out why, according to their theory, the UoHI committed unnecessary academic fraud. To make their timeline work, they have SADO receiving no credit for classes she actually took yet receiving credits for classes that took place when she wasn’t even in the state. The number of profs, TAs, advisors & administrators needed to collaborate on such an elaborate fraud is vast—and involves UoWA just as much as UoHI. That’s a lot of people to have not even one, ever, breathe a word of the conspiracy.
No one will answer the question, ‘why didn’t they just give her course credit for the classes she actually took?’ They way they’ve actually credited her destroys Obama’s Dream meme. Who at these two Us hates Obama so much that they wd commit large scale academic fraud for the purpose of undercutting Dreams?? & how did they persuade so many liberals to go along w cutting the legs out from under Obama’s much ballyhooed ‘memoir’?
One day you’ll wake up and find the answer to your question lies in the reason that Anna Obama was left out of the narrative because they really never expected anyone would find her. Charlette Le Fevre upset the apple-cart. Poor Mary, once she was told she had babysat the potus, she couldn’t condradict Charlette without revealing who Anna was.
But you haven’t been paying attention, so you wouldn’t have noticed. You’re too busy being funny and sucking up to the resident critic, who rarely supplies sources but no one seems to care that all he does is try to steal my oxygen.
And btw, when I tell you the truth, you perform like the fly caught in a web, you struggle and struggle and just make yourself look more stupid. Why don’t you have a little break from being insulting and THINK for a change?
You need to wash your mouth out with soap, you just called David Barry. Might that be because they are so hard to tell apart? Has it penetrated that they are one and the same child?
Projection. Look it up.
Contribute something or get off the pot.
you said that david was barry- thats the picture you put up huh? you are saying david is barry, barack, are whoever he is.. I just wanted to see if i understood you is all fred—
From where, exactly, did you derive the authority to order me around? You can issue commands all day; they only make you look like a silly, petty would-be dictator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.