If she is now publicly affirmatively claiming the Bomford document is a fake created to discredit the purported Kenyan document, in my opinion she is making a serious tactical mistake which could come back to burn her and damage her credibility.
How so? - - The Aussie doc is absolutely a fake, and didn't exist before Sunday mid day.
Actually, Orly is claiming the report, not the document,
was created to discredit her efforts, not discredit the Kenyan BC.
“Bomford report was created to try to discredit my efforts”
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
For more about the David Bomford BC:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307694/posts
I wasn't aware she had any of that -- credibility, that is. Did you catch her shrieking on MSNBC last evening? A professional doesn't shriek or scream if they wish to be taken seriously. And why on earth would anyone with "credibility" agree to appear with Schuster on MSNBC, or Colbert? Did she actually think she wouldn't be attacked or mocked? Or she just so deparate for attention she'll appear anywhere she's invited? I'm almost expecting her to pop up next on state-controlled Russian TV, since that's where she's headed.
From her so-called "debunking" --
2. More then one person had certified copies of this document.
Who are these persons who have "certified copies?" She originally stated that one source had "authenticated" this document -- from what, a photo? And who is this "authenticator"? -- certainly no credentialed document expert would be foolish enough to authenticate a document from a photograph. And a photograph is all that Orly has, since she filed a photo of the document, same as posted on the net, with her latest submission to the court.