Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(R-MO) Senator Bond speaks in support of Sotomayor confirmation
MissouriNet ^ | 8/5/2009 | Steve Walsh

Posted on 08/05/2009 7:27:40 PM PDT by markomalley

Missouri's senior U.S. Senator is among a small group of Republican Senators announcing the decision to vote in favor of the confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Senator Christopher "Kit" Bond says that while he respects his fellow Republicans who oppose the nomination, he hopes his vote bodes well for a future with less polarization and less confrontation.

Bond points to his support for President Bill Clinton's two High Court nominees - Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

"I supported these nominees of a Democratic President as did 86 of my colleagues for Justice Breyer and 95 of my colleagues for Justice Ginsburg," said Bond during a speech from the floor of the Senate. "I hope those votes do not reflect a time that has slipped away when partisanship did not infect every facet of our political life."

Bond told the Senate he wants to see a time when Senators put politics aside - something he says then-Senator Barack Obama refused to do when he voted against President George W. Bush's nominees.

"I could not forget that time as, regrettably, President Obama did when he was in the Senate," said Bond. "I could easily say, as Senator Obama said, that I disagree with a nominee's judicial approach and that allows me to oppose the nominee of a different party. Luckily for President Obama I do not agree with Senator Obama. I reject the Obama approach to nominees."

Bond says it's time to put politics aside when it comes to judicial nominees.

"From our liberal friends, I hope they remember this day when another qualified nominee is before the Senate who is conservative," said Bond. "The standard set by Senator Obama should not govern the Senate."

Bond then expressed his satisfaction that the Senate has reviewed the Sotomayor nomination, with no significant findings against her, and urged his colleagues to follow him in voting to confirm her.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: rino; scotus; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
when is he up for re-election?
1 posted on 08/05/2009 7:27:40 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Someone rip my heart out of my chest now.


2 posted on 08/05/2009 7:28:59 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

So MO, you know where he stands on the second amendment now don’t you?


3 posted on 08/05/2009 7:29:15 PM PDT by bayliving (I don't need an elected "LEADER". What I NEED is an elected "REPRESENTATIVE.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Is he usually this naive?


4 posted on 08/05/2009 7:29:29 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Just sad.


5 posted on 08/05/2009 7:29:42 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

FYI, the other turncoats, so far, are: Mel Martinez (FL, also retiring), Lamar Alexander (TN), Susan Collins (ME), Olympia Snowe (ME), Lindsey Graham (SC), and Richard Lugar (IN).


6 posted on 08/05/2009 7:29:45 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Bond is a moron. Throw the bum out!


7 posted on 08/05/2009 7:29:59 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Proud member of "The Angry Mob" est. April 19, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Hey they’re making guests pay for their meals at the white house these days - you may get a dinner invite - but you’ll have to pay your own way. Hardly seems worth it.


8 posted on 08/05/2009 7:31:03 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

And Judd Gregg (NH).


9 posted on 08/05/2009 7:31:24 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but he will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
...he hopes his vote bodes well for a future with less polarization and less confrontation.

And many little girls hope for a pony at Christmas...

SCREW THE GOP!!

10 posted on 08/05/2009 7:31:55 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Primary the dumb sob.


11 posted on 08/05/2009 7:32:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/19476

# # # #

The Honorable Christopher “Kit” Bond
US Senator-Missouri

It is with great disappointment that the Buchanan County Republican Central Committee finds the need to submit this letter expressing our discontent with Senator Kit Bond’s decision to vote in favor of the appointment of Justice Sonia Sotomayor to the United States Supreme Court.

The committee fully recognizes and appreciates Justice Sotomayor’s background and service, but feels her past rulings and public comments are in conflict with the appropriate role of a justice on the highest court in the land. We are saddened that a fellow Republican entrusted
with the responsibility to vote on her qualifications and temperament believes otherwise.

The Buchanan County Republican Central Committee has a long history of support for Senator Bond. Many of our members have volunteered tirelessly on his campaigns — many since his days as Governor of this great state. It is with regret that we must condemn his announced yes vote on the confirmation of Justice Sotomayor.

In his statement to the press, Senator Bond noted that “elections have consequences”. By ascribing an affirmative vote on her confirmation as the result of “elections have consequences”, Senator Bond diminishes the balance of power constitutionally provided through the Senate confirmation process. His actions deny us, the voters who elected him, those same, resulting “elections have consequences” benefits since he is abdicating the senatorial powers he earned when we elected him.

While fully aware that Republicans lost the Presidential race in 2008, as a committee we understand that the loss does not mean we must abandon our principles as a political party by giving a free pass to those who would tear down the foundations of our great nation. Nominee Sotomayor’s past statements and actions do not reflect the fair-minded values of the US Constitution, Missourians, or the Republican Party.

We respectfully request that Senator Bond reconsider his position on this vote and cast a NO vote for the confirmation of Justice Sotomayor.

If his yes vote is an attempt to leave public service with a legacy of bipartisanship at the expense of conceding his principles, we would remind him of what an empty legacy that would be. We hope that he will finish his long tenure as a public servant by clinging to the foundations that have returned him to office for so many years.

Respectfully,

The Buchanan County Republican Central Commmittee


12 posted on 08/05/2009 7:33:08 PM PDT by Optimist (I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
"I supported these nominees of a Democratic President as did 86 of my colleagues for Justice Breyer and 95 of my colleagues for Justice Ginsburg," said Bond during a speech from the floor of the Senate.

Riiiight!!! And because a republican senator won't overrule a democrat President's choice, no matter how liberal, biased, or unqualified, he expects that, if and when the situation is reversed, democrats will return the favor. Tell that to Robert Bork!

13 posted on 08/05/2009 7:33:10 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Kenya tell me where Obama was born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
with no significant findings against her,

Nothing significant Kit... nothing at all in todays world. Her eyes blinking a thousand times a second as she was lying through her teeth, ah nothing to worry about.

Good riddance! Thank God you are not running for reelection.

14 posted on 08/05/2009 7:33:22 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

not soon enough


15 posted on 08/05/2009 7:33:27 PM PDT by 09Patriot (I am a MILITANT Conservative, compassionate conservatism got us NOWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Get a load of this quote from Kit Bond:

“There’s been no significant finding against her, there’s been no public uprising against her,” said Bond.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Judd+Gregg+will+vote+for+Sotomayor&articleId=4bab4040-9fbd-44b9-ad19-c0ac25316ee5


16 posted on 08/05/2009 7:34:11 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but he will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I once swore I would never leave the Republican party … with all the RINOs running about, dumping our American values (for what?) I have had a change of heart. I’m gone.


17 posted on 08/05/2009 7:34:56 PM PDT by doc1019 (Obama? Not so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

he retires next year. Will not run again.


18 posted on 08/05/2009 7:34:56 PM PDT by golfisnr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Bond's term is up next year and he's retiring. A Carnahan and a Blunt are probably going to square off for the seat.

Normally, he's not like this. I guess with nothing to lose, this sort of thing happens. Term limits in the legislature have given us a bunch of republicans that block all sorts of stuff.

19 posted on 08/05/2009 7:36:28 PM PDT by Desdemona (True Christianity requires open hearts and open minds - not blind hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

His cover is the bi-partisan tally for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Someone needs to ask him a follow-up, do you agree with racial profiling, because Sotomeyer sure does.


20 posted on 08/05/2009 7:47:01 PM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson