Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Birth Story Unraveling - Mother In Univ Class In Seattle 15 Days After Obama Supposedly Born!
Dr. Jerome Corsi / Rusty Humphries Show

Posted on 08/08/2009 9:20:49 PM PDT by MindBender26

Edited on 08/08/2009 9:33:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Jerone Corsi, Ph. D. is about to drop another bombshell, casting further doubt on the stories of President Obama's birth.

Dr. Corsi, whose doctorate is from Harvard, is an excellent researcher and investigative journalist. He was the driving force behind the Swift Boat veterans telling the truth about War Phony John Kerry. He is also the author of "Obamanation."

In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.

We are expected to believe that in just15 days, she gave birth, stayed in the hospital for a few days, them packed her things and left her house in Hawaii, moved to Seattle, got established there, registered for, then began classed in Seattle, all the while caring for her newborn.

The new evidence also destroys another Obama legend-lie. According to the President’s autobiography, Obama Sr. and Durhan-Soetoro were supposedly deeply in love and made a happy home together in Hawaii, complete with their baby, until Obama Sr. had to move to Boston to attend Harvard and could not afford take Stanley and baby Barack with him.

According to Dr. Corsi’s new written evidence, Durham-Soetoro was in college classes, thousands of miles away from Hawaii and did not return to the islands until long Obama Sr. left for Harvard.

Dr. Corsi also reveals that a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth requires no proof of any kind and could simply be issued on the sworn statement of one parent.

All of this simply adds to the fast growing uncertainty and suspicion over Obama’s supposed birth stories. Is August 4, 1961, his real birth date? Where was he really born? When he traveled to the Middle East in the 1990s, he did not have a US passport. What country issued him a passport, and why? Why won’t he release the one document that would answer all the questions?

It just gets deeper and deeper.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1961not1962; article2section1; barackobama; barrysoetoro; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; corsi; dunhamnotdurham; impeachobama; kenya; naturalborn; obama; obamafamily; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; soetoro; stanleynotsydney; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 421-429 next last
To: El Gato

“...and you don’t sound anywhere near crazy enough for that.”

Thank you very much.
The reason that I am not a politician or a lawyer is that then, I would have to be around politicians and lawyers.


301 posted on 08/09/2009 12:06:12 PM PDT by gigster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

No doubt, knowing that momma was a ho messed with his mind. That, and being exposed to all-out, Moscow-line communism during the Cold War had to cause this guy to have serious issues.

I remember finding out at age 12 that my very Catholic mom was previously married and divorced. Just that sent me into a tailspin for days. But a mother like Annie??

It’s not hard to imagine how a childhood like Hussein’s could produce a flaming psychopath.


302 posted on 08/09/2009 12:16:10 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
UW has a quarter system now.

If they did in 1961, the term wouldn't begin until the very end of September.

Most mothers wouldn't want to be separated from a two month or seven week-old baby, but I'd double check on this 15 day story.

If Obama's mother was definitely in classes in Seattle two weeks after her son was born, could we finally lay this stupid Kenya fable to rest?

303 posted on 08/09/2009 12:20:14 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; LucyT
PAGE SEVEN OF NINE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/10313894/The-Myth-of-Barack-Obamas-Early-Life-Leahy-Cached “...Stanley Ann Dunham enrolled in extension courses, not full time regular courses, at the University of Washington for the Fall Quarter of 1961 and the winter Quarter of 1962. She was enrolled full time in the Spring Quarter of 1962... =================================================
304 posted on 08/09/2009 12:20:41 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Oh my gosh. DUH. There is no news here. No one has ever said that Obama’s mom and Dad settled down for a happy marriage. They did not live in the well-to-do home listed on the newspaper birth announcement, ever, nor did the Dunhams. One wealthy family lived there for decades. (Who knows how that address went on the records?)

Obviously Obama’s mama left the baby with her parents and went off to Washington to school. Today women are out and about within days of birth. She was probably in denial and probably even her family didn’t want the shame of their pride and joy only child to not just be “burdened” with a baby, but to miss out on her college education.


305 posted on 08/09/2009 12:21:51 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Well really I was into my second bottle wine by the time I posted. might not be a good idea to drink and post. LOL!

My apologies


306 posted on 08/09/2009 12:23:27 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: David

For reference, here is the transcript.

Almost certainly she was in night school in the Fall quarter and was not taking her courses by correspondence.

You can see in the bottom right corner of the transcript her credits for extension courses. If you read the fine print you can see that the university distinguished extension courses from correspondence courses by an "x" in front of the course number.

Her neighbor Mary T. in her interview said she was babysitting for Ann while Ann was taking night classes at the university, and as I recall that recollection related to the period around Feb-Mar 1962.

Looking at the credits and courseload, it appears she was taking the same type and load of courses in both the Fall and Winter quarters.

You may well be right about the date being Sept 19 and not Aug 19. The date on the transcript could read either way, and we have your recollection to rely on.

To my mind, the curious thing is not that whether she started school in August or September, but that there she was at that time in Seattle, a teenaged mother taking her newborn baby and moving far away from her husband and parents.

Her courses were "Modern Government" and "Intro to the Study of Man" -- it is simply not credible to think that she went there because she couldn't find analogous courses at the University of Hawaii.

Perhaps Barack Sr. didn't believe the baby was actually his, and dumped her.

There has been speculation that Ann learned about his other wife in Kenya and left him for that reason. But that is completely contrary to the interview with Mary T., in which she said Ann told her that the baby's father might have to take a Kenyan wife because of tribal obligations and that Ann was okay with that. In other words, Ann did not know that Barack Sr. already had taken a Kenyan wife.

It appears Ann did not resume residence in Hawaii until after Barack Sr. left for Harvard.

307 posted on 08/09/2009 12:25:27 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
I agree that Obama is our first Anti-American President.

However, that does not mean that I have to accept YOUR definition of “Natural Born Citizen” -—

It was the intent of the founders to prevent RETROATIVE citizenship, through legislation, to qualify someone for POTUS.

It was also the intent of our founders that Naturalized citizens would NOT be qualified, for POTUS.

However, if you ARE a citizen, at the very moment of birth, then you are a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!

It is possible that Communist Frank Marshal Davis is Obama’s Father. In which case, Obama Jr. MIGHT be qualified for Potus, if Ann was not truly married to Obama Sr. -— even if Obama was born abroad.

I fully agree that Obama is the villain here.

He should hold the office in such high regard that he would be more than willing to defend his qualifications and avoid a crisis, just as McCain did, when requested.

However, your definition of “Natural Born Citizen” is no more than the rehashed and untested opinions of a few others, throughout history.

Very, very few people with any authority agree with your definition.

My definition would probably hold up in Court.

Yours will not.

However, you have every right to YOUR opinion.

My point is only that it is YOUR opinion, and not established law.

308 posted on 08/09/2009 12:28:42 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.

It says 1961


309 posted on 08/09/2009 12:31:27 PM PDT by snippy_about_it (Looking for our Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Who says she took the baby to Washington? She did so well in her classes, maybe she left the baby with Grandma? This woman never bonded with her child, and this early separation may prove why. She abandoned him several more times in his short childhood.

Seriously, we should NEVER, and I mean NEVER, elect as our President someone who had a childhood so lacking in unconditional love. We should almost never elect a President who desperately wants the job, anyway...


310 posted on 08/09/2009 12:31:32 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; Fred Nerks; LucyT
I’ve been going back and re-reading old posts and am increasingly interested in Fred Nerks’ assertion that there is no evidence whatsoever that Ann Dunham set foot in Hawaii until she went there with Barry 0 as a toddler. Do you have a take on this?

Fred is correct as usual. My own view is that she did in fact go all the way back to Hawaii on August 8--I think that her actions from the birth date in Mombasa in August 4 (3 West Coast US Time) were driven by some direction, perhaps her mother, to attempt to establish citizenship in the US by birth under the then citizenship statutes.

Sure, the COLB might have been a complete fake (including the August 8 date for filing); in which case whatever she did file might have been filed at any point in that period. My own expectation is that we will ultimately see a filing in Hawaii made around the August 8 period. I accept the announcement in the newspaper also--that could be someone who effectively recut the microfiche in five libraries but that seems excessive and I don't think so.

So someone did something to give Hawaii Birth Records notice of the birth around the 8th of August. I think something got filed in the August 8 time period. I further speculate that she intended to be able to put his footprint on something before she filed it which is why they hurried to get him back.

There isn't any evidence that they did that. But if I were going to try to pursue their objective, I would have brought the kid to Hawaii; found a doctor friend who delivered babies at one of the local Hospitals; had him brief the Certification paper and footprint it; and slip it into his pile of deliveries for that period.

Something went wrong with that scheme or they couldn't fully execute and they did something that was part way and had some defects on its face.

But Fred's correct and there isn't any evidence she was in Hawaii again in that time period.

And it isn't fatal to the Kenya birth thesis that she wasn't. She registered for extension classes at the U--so what; she could have done that from anywhere by mail.

311 posted on 08/09/2009 12:34:13 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Don’t you love people who do that?

Maybe I’ll start looking for topics here that don’t interest me and then post comments about what a boring subject to waste time with.


312 posted on 08/09/2009 12:35:28 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Grandma had a full time job in a bank.

If Ann was sans baby Barry, one would think she would have taken a regular course-load in the Fall quarter 1961, instead of two night courses, which was the same courseload she took in the Winter quarter when we know she had baby Barry based on the baby-sitting recollections of her neighbor.

So the evidence points to Ann being with baby in Seattle in the Fall quarter.


313 posted on 08/09/2009 12:35:40 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it

It didn’t when it was first posted.


314 posted on 08/09/2009 12:38:43 PM PDT by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
>>>Obviously Obama’s mama left the baby with her parents and went off to Washington to school. Today women are out and about within days of birth. She was probably in denial and probably even her family didn’t want the shame of their pride and joy only child to not just be “burdened” with a baby, but to miss out on her college education.

This is exactly the evidence-less supposition we criticize the MSM for. There is no "obviously" "probably" or other delayed mind-reading about it. Nor is there any evidence that this was any other excuse we want to give for this.

It all boils down to one point. There is a reason that Obama will not release his birth certificate. The COLB is worthless. The reason must be very significant for him to take so much flak about not releasing it. There is an huge amount of both direct and circumstantial evidence to indicate that he is telling lies about his birth, and as a result, his legal qualifications to be president.

It all boils down to one point; if there isn't a major problem, then release the birth certificate, school records and other pertinent information!

What is he hiding?

315 posted on 08/09/2009 12:46:43 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Never Kick Leftists When They Are Down. Let Them Halfway Back Up. You Get Much Better Leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

So Obama knows Senior isn’t his father, which is why he identifies so closely with him and hates America.

You need to work on your logic a bit.


316 posted on 08/09/2009 12:47:58 PM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn; Jedidah; LucyT; MindBender26
Really nice job Sir John--good research and clear thinking. Thanks. I am going to respond in two tranches--the first to have a separate U of W timing comment I can use again elsewhere.

For reference, here is the transcript. Almost certainly she was in night school in the Fall quarter and was not taking her courses by correspondence. You can see in the bottom right corner of the transcript her credits for extension courses. If you read the fine print you can see that the university distinguished extension courses from correspondence courses by an "x" in front of the course number. Her neighbor Mary T. in her interview said she was babysitting for Ann while Ann was taking night classes at the university, and as I recall that recollection related to the period around Feb-Mar 1962. Looking at the credits and courseload, it appears she was taking the same type and load of courses in both the Fall and Winter quarters. You may well be right about the date being Sept 19 and not Aug 19. The date on the transcript could read either way, and we have your recollection to rely on.

Correspondence courses were extension courses. I know. My little sister did exactly that which is exactly how they appear on her transcript also.

Unfortunately, the thing I haven't yet said is that it may be that the night school courses were also extension courses. And I have a vague recollection that may have been in fact the case from something another friend did in exactly that time period.

Of course the only evidence we have that the winter quarter classes were night school is the statement from the lady who was babysitting--and she was expressly uncertain and that may not have been the case.

It makes more sense that the first date (bottom right hand corner) is the date she registered rather than the date classes started which for extension classes was done by mail. You know that Winter Quarter Classes didn't start until the first week in January so you know the December 27, 1961 date for the Winter Quarter registration doesn't reflect her presence in class which didn't start until the following week.

On that basis, the 9/19 or 8/19 date probably would have reflected registration but not class start, whether night school or correspondence.

And the 8/19 date would be too long for Fall Quarter also. The 12/11 and 12/12 dates indicate the date she took the final (which might have happened for a correspondence course or a night school course); the quarter was ten weeks long--the partial thanksgiving week offset days lost for holidays; plus finals. So if the date was 8/19, it didn't represent a class start date.

Your suggestion that the start date really is 9/19 makes some sense; that's about when she might have registered for an extension class, correspondence or night school, for fall quarter.

I continue to doubt that she was physically present in Seattle in the fall of 1961--but it is certainly possible that she was. And for that matter, even if she made it back there by the 19th of August, that too doesn't exclude either the prospect that he was born in Kenya on August 4 (3 Seattle time and date) or the prospect that she got him all the way back to Hawaii on the 8th to register and then back to Seattle 10 days later.

But I continue to be pretty confident that whatever happened with the U of W, she wasn't physically in class in August and the fact that she was registering for extension classes fall quarter doesn't put her there then either.

317 posted on 08/09/2009 1:08:15 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; snippy_about_it; RaceBannon; bitt; BP2; Fred Nerks; pissant; Calpernia; LucyT; ...

318 posted on 08/09/2009 1:22:10 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
There has been speculation that Ann learned about his other wife in Kenya and left him for that reason. But that is completely contrary to the interview with Mary T., in which she said Ann told her that the baby's father might have to take a Kenyan wife because of tribal obligations and that Ann was okay with that. In other words, Ann did not know that Barack Sr. already had taken a Kenyan wife. It appears Ann did not resume residence in Hawaii until after Barack Sr. left for Harvard.

Observe also that the statements to Mary T and to Susan Blake about her happy relationship with her husband refute a later date for the initial Seattle appearance, however you structure it.

8/19 or 9/19, no later than September, she was establishing a Seattle base at a time he was living in Hawaii. That isn't picking up and moving back in with him and their kid.

That is in part why I think she went back to Hawaii first--to see if she was going to put the deal back together there. It turned out she wasn't; she went back to Seattle and started over.

319 posted on 08/09/2009 1:22:40 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Exactly.

It’s been an exhausting year since we first started digging around on this mystery man. While we’ve learned a good deal- we still do not know what he’s hiding. We simply know that he IS hiding something.

At the rate he’s trying to push through cap n trade and health care - it’s looking like a race to the finish- will the facts about his past come out before he turns this country into a fascist state?


320 posted on 08/09/2009 1:26:37 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson