Posted on 08/09/2009 9:40:50 AM PDT by wagglebee
The moment this happens, the American Republic will have FAILED.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
bttt
Obamacare
Finally, Democrats embrace the death penalty
http://www.zazzle.com/obamacare_3_tshirt-235341680860146652
Obamacare + Cap-n-trade = Soylent Green
http://www.zazzle.com/obamacare_2_tshirt-235439043872849285
Obamcare
“Cash for cripples”
http://www.zazzle.com/obamacare_tshirt-235668055276900107
Can anyone point out the sections of this “Health Care” program that allows for rationing? I want to cite it in my letter to the criminals holding public office.
Of course Im no expert (like Obama) but it seems like common sense to me. When a limited supply meets an unlimited demand, somethings gonna give. Dont forget the 30 million illegal aliens that will be added to the system (hundreds of millions before its all over). You do the math.
bump!
Check this thread by Jeff Head, he has everything on the death counseling and he can probably tell you exactly where to look for the rationing.
Using the twisted ‘logic’ of NObama, this means that a person who is 63 y/o and owns a company which hires 200 people will NOT be given health care...
BUT—the 24 y/o person who has been on welfare and food stamps all their life, with 6 kids none of whom know who their father is WILL get healthcare—her and her 6 bastards.
This is exactly the kind of upside-down logic that has people yelling at Congress members at ‘town hall’ meetings and other gatherings.
All of this is fertile ground for Sarah Palin, IMO.
If there is a “silver lining” to any of this, it is that Zero and his thugs seem so out of touch with the American public that they are totally unaware that everything is collapsing all around them.
Thank you.
For example:
A fat 65 year old engineer who needs more than average health care but has lead a productive life and is the prime “knowledge holder” for a plant or process has economic value most likely well above his “cost” to society. In fact, it may be that his expert knowledge that benefits us all has come at a cost to his health. Should we use this against him in the end? In the world of the “young/healthy” crowd, this person is not worth the price of a new knee, hip, or ongoing drug treatment.
A 25 year old skinny surfer dude who does not plan to get a job and gets chronic exposure to to UV rays and a high risk for melanoma later in life is thought to be “worth” something to society and worthy of any medical treatment.
The example is extreme to point out that one cannot and should not make worth judgments about people. We all run risks of health problems as we grow older. We all make some decisions and have some risk factors that bring on health costs later in life. Some bureaucrat in an ivory tower should not be making decisions based on stats and age. There are so many different factors involved in a persons worth to society.
You may wish to recall that the racist jerk-off artist Jocelyn Elders, our erstwhile surgeon general, once opined for the record that a young drug addict was worth more than a fifty-odd year old man with a heart condition.
Yes, she did.
Excellent graphic.
I hope Sarah Palin continues to speak out. But I do want to point out to you and others here who fervently wish for her to run for president that the layers and layers of Federal bureaucrats who would remain in place, even if there were a 99% Republican Congress, will mount the same kind of opposition against her and her family members that you have already seen, only worse.
This country needs a united Republican "machine" to mount an opposition, so that whomever runs will have some layers of protection. Those who want to save the Republic have to stop shooting into the circle and get organized behind a candidate and a few more or less universally appealing conservative points, then hammer them repeatedly.
Many who love Sarah do not want to see her destroyed. She is too good for the job.
If people over 65 are expendable, then there shouldn’t be any serving in Congress or on the USSC. Especially sick ones.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.