Shock: Inside the Healthcare Bill, Part 2

Economic Policy Journal ^ | 8/10/09 | Robert Wenzel

[G Larry]

I fully understand compound risks, but it is not an inherant element of the plan.
It isn’t “in the bill”.

There are other aspects attributable to incrementalism and “cause & effect”, but we should characterize them as such to maintain credibility.

[Safrguns]

>>> I realize there is some bit of forming an opinion on what each one means, but as close as possible to what is actually being said in them would be helpful.

I’m Currently looking at this one: so far looks better

http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3AClHRqNIRhYUJ%3Awww.liberty.edu%2Fmedia%2F9980%2Fattachments%2Fhealthcare_overview_obama_072909.pdf&pli=1

[Enough is ENOUGH]

Deductive reasoning works for me.

[EternalVigilance]

Haven't even read the posts, and had to vent, so I'm sure someone has pointed out:

THIS IS COMMUNISM!

[EternalVigilance]

PG 900 The Public Health Workforce Corps includes veterinarians

THIS IS EVEN COMMUNISM FOR PETS AND LIVESTOCK!

[G Larry]

You can’t claim something is in the bill that is not.

To maintain crediblity we MUST explain the components leading to our conclusions!

[Kackikat]

Snafus are norm for gov’t