Is Cap and Trade for Babies Next?

Christian Post ^ | 8/13/2009 | R. Albert Mohler, Jr.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

But one thing we probably know....these two dweebs have never engaged in that kind of greenhouse gas production, unless it was with each other.

Poor dears. I suspect that there's a woman out there for just about every man. You may have to order her over the internet, but she's out there!

[AFPhys]

I believe that my family accounts for more emissions than a one GigaWatt dirty coal plant!

Wheeeeee!!!! Take that, Greenies!

(by the way, the bulk of them are quite conservative :^)

[victim soul]

“A nation that kills its own children is a nation without hope.” John Paul II

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

I have a far better idea. All liberals must commit suicide in order to save the planet.

[the invisib1e hand]

funny. things no sooner become "rights" (i.e. "reproductive rights") than they become "privileges" (bestowed by the state).

The founder were so on their game, enumerating inalienable rights, as they did.

[SeekAndFind]

The founder were so on their game, enumerating inalienable rights, as they did.

The problem with the founders is they used the words : "among these are"... The liberals have now understood these words to mean -- yes, but they are NOT LIMITED TO these and now have expanded these rights.

[the invisib1e hand]

Inalienable rights are not limited to what the founders spelled out. In fact, the right of a baby to be born is inalienable, though not explicitly said so in the Bill of Rights.

The founders didn't have a problem. They declared, as the basic law of our country, that there are rights that the government does bestow but is obligated to recognize.

What the left does is to demand recognition of created "rights," and assume authority over them. It a power play: the "plantation" method exposed.

[myknowledge]

As Galatians 6:7 illustrates.