Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

When congress sets the tax rates high enough that they can decide who gets “credits” or “deductions” it is wrong. Rates should cover the legitimate expenses of gov’t not pandering to different voting blocs. I like pets as well as the next guy but it isn’t the gov’ts place to encourage or discourage having them.

If I overwithhold then I am due reimbursement.


33 posted on 08/18/2009 5:41:12 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Is there a “pet owner bloc” that’s mostly Rats? I wouldn’t think so. Pet ownership is immensely popular. There are far more pet owners than home owners. This actually would spread tax relief pretty broadly, and without the need to add a new government bureau.

Oh, and this would also royally p*ss off PETA, which does NOT believe in pets!


34 posted on 08/18/2009 5:48:35 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (When did it become the Democrat You-Shut-Up-And-Listen-To-Me Tour?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson