Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoma abortion law overturned (Required women to view ultrasound of baby before killing it)
Los Angeles Times ^ | August 19, 2009

Posted on 08/19/2009 3:35:44 AM PDT by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Zakeet
And from the burning bowels of Hell, right near the sphincter, the undearly departed George Tiller screams with whatever is left of his lungs, "YESSSSSSS!!!!!!"
21 posted on 08/19/2009 5:39:52 AM PDT by mkjessup (Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Way to go OK! Returning to that guiltless birth control methodology...That’ll work...

/big time sarc

The Pro-Choice cycle...

- Make a choice to go out...

- Make a choice to get a little tipsy...

- Make a choice to spy a potential “sure thing”...

- Make a choice to go somewhere to continue the evening...

- Make a choice to get “comfortable”...

- Make a choice to have unprotected jiggy-time...

- Make a choice to not accept responsibility and be accountable for your “choices”...

- Make a choice to sweep the life under the rug...(putting it nicely)

- Make a choice to do it all over again, because the government says its ok, we’ll take care of it...

See how neat the whole “Pro-Choice” lifestyle works???

Somehow I am beginning to believe that we as a country do not deserve to live under that guidelines of our Constitution and the freedoms it affords because of a majority of people who are immoral and without virtue which is really the basis of that Constitution and those freedoms...

John Adams said it best...

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

Ben Franklin bookended that statement with...

“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”

Be aware that I do not believe that being a virtuous person is contained only to those who are religious or faithful to a higher authority...I believe virtuous people are also folks who distinctly understand the differnece between right and wrong, not based upon any religious template either...


22 posted on 08/19/2009 5:41:08 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Oklahoma County District Judge Vicki Robertson said the law violated constitutional requirements that a legislative measure deal only with one subject.

Well, Vicki, I guess you'll have to rule that MOST of OK's laws are 'unconstituional' then.

Most 'laws' are vehicles that carry all kinds of other crap along with them!

23 posted on 08/19/2009 5:41:15 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
A Tulsa clinic filed suit in October challenging the ultrasound provision, arguing that the law was unconstitutionally vague and was not clear about what a doctor should tell a woman undergoing the ultrasound.

IDIOT!

They should 'say': "LOOK at the PICTURES!"

24 posted on 08/19/2009 5:42:32 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John O

I actually checked that verse out. Nice one.


25 posted on 08/19/2009 5:43:27 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Toti said. "It's an affront to women's autonomy and decision-making power, and it's also an intrusion to the physician-patient relationship."

45,000,000 'fetuses' also said it's a slight inconvenience.

26 posted on 08/19/2009 5:44:03 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sueuprising

Anyone willing to take a sucker bet?

MiZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Toti has had an abortion. I’ll give 100 to 1 odds. Any takers?

Pro-aborts are most likely “had-aborts”. They know what they’ve done - killed a baby. They don’t want anything to exist in society taht reminds them of that fact.


27 posted on 08/19/2009 5:44:18 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

You have a point.

After giving a lecture on the fact that there is no discernable difference between infanticide and abortion,

a man was approached by a couple of “feminists”.

They said “you’ve changed our minds”.
He said “you’re pro-life now?”

“No, we’re now PRO-INFANTICIDE.”


28 posted on 08/19/2009 5:46:12 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; John O

Psalm 109:8

 May his days be few;
       may another take his place of leadership.

 

 

 

Isaiah 55:11
So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void,

         but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.


29 posted on 08/19/2009 5:50:17 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The ultrasound provision takes away a patient's choice about whether or not to view an ultrasound...

God forbid that we should take away somebody's choice about whether to look at medical information concerning their "own body."

How about striking down the laws that take away my choice about whether my tax dollars are spent on killing unborn children?

30 posted on 08/19/2009 6:06:15 AM PDT by john in springfield (One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield

It’s not even a “conflict of rights”.

It’s the right of one human to live
versus the “right” of another human to kill.

That’s not even an arguable “conflict”.

And, wrt this legislation, what’s wrong with an INFORMED choice? If it’s “no big deal” or “not a baby” as the pro-aborts try to tell us, then what’s the problem with seeing the ultrasound?


31 posted on 08/19/2009 6:08:58 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The Oklahoma legislators need to impeach the judge. The robed clown was not put on the bench to create legislation.


32 posted on 08/19/2009 6:11:58 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; wagglebee
Her ruling also overturned provisions in the law that allowed doctors and other healthcare providers to refuse to take part in an abortion for moral or religious reasons

Health care professionals are now de-facto state executioners of the innocent. How do these judges sleep at night? Why do Leftist "rights" always, eventually end up murdering millions?

33 posted on 08/19/2009 6:22:03 AM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The Center for Reproductive Rights says: "It's an affront to women's autonomy and decision-making power, and it's also an intrusion to the physician-patient relationship.", does it?

Funny how the Center for Reproductive Rights has had nothing but unkind words about the fact that their male capos in the Democrat-controlled government are conspiring at this very moment to take ALL women's autonomy & decision-making power over EVERY INCH of their bodies in addition to their wombs, and intruding into ALL female patient-physician relationships under the dems' scheme to take over of the private health-care industry.

The plug will be pulled on their sacred 'right to privacy' as surely as it will be pulled on the non-productive citizens such as the elderly & infirm as it will on abortion-seeking women & they have no problem with that?

The government is now seeking to usurp complete control over "Our Bodies, OurSelves" and putting their fascistic hands onto not just women's wombs, but on every single inch from head-to-toe, and the CRR is worried a about a law which gives women additional facts to consider in order to make an informed choice of their own free-will & volition?

This just proves what this pro-life feminist has suspected all her life: the faux feminists advocating for the financial interests of the wealthy & powerful male-owned abortion industry see women as weak, mindless children incapable of making their own decisions in their own best interests.

34 posted on 08/19/2009 7:31:00 AM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There are few things in this world more disgusting than a woman who will kill her own child.


35 posted on 08/19/2009 7:54:58 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leilani
oops - many typos in my post @#34, sorry. Should be the CRR has nothing but kind words, rather than unkind words, for starters. Mea culpa.
36 posted on 08/19/2009 8:30:06 AM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: leilani
Did anyone wonder "where are the men in this story?"

So much for the now-feminized, "gentler" society that has taken over from those male-volent perpetrators of male-violence...you know, men.

I would hazard the guess that the old patriarchy was quite a bit safer for the younger and weaker ones than this brave new world we now have -- even factoring in the childhood diseases that were not conquered yet (disease that were, in fact, conquered by men!)

37 posted on 08/19/2009 8:42:42 AM PDT by thulldud (It HAS happened here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I'm torn on this.

On one hand I'm angry. Women have changed their minds because of this law.

On the other hand, I'm not really sure the government has the right to take my money and give it to someone else to cover their medical procedures, so there's a part of me that's glad this law was struck down.

38 posted on 08/19/2009 10:36:44 AM PDT by walsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

The FBI should do it if the states don’t.


39 posted on 08/20/2009 4:19:27 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson