I gave him a significant degree of some benefit of the doubt for quite a number of weeks.
I’ve seen nothing suggesting convincingly that this encyclical warranted anything more than outrage.
Lofty sounding globalist double-speak is unfitting for his role or his person or his position or even the term “Christian.”
We can always find what we want to find in most wighting can’t we? If this were not true we wouldn’t have multiple Christian denominations now would we?