Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is huge. There could be 25 to 30 states that eventually go this route - most of the Southeast, all of the Southwest - most if not all of 'flyover country.'

In addition, most of these state will be among those that separate from the USA and become part of a separate Conservative nation.

1 posted on 08/27/2009 12:34:31 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Ron C.

A P.S. The three west coast states would be cut off from their eastern liberal-state comrades! How sweet it is...


2 posted on 08/27/2009 12:36:21 AM PDT by Ron C. (Wake up - Go see how it really is - then speak from knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Especially if they use the ATF’s own insane determinations as to what constitutes “construction” against the ATF.


3 posted on 08/27/2009 12:44:00 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.; LucyT

Popcorn time...


4 posted on 08/27/2009 12:44:48 AM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
Bump to the top!

6 posted on 08/27/2009 12:58:10 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Treasure State Patriots in Big Sky country!


7 posted on 08/27/2009 1:05:41 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! The "other" Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
The bho administration would draw a perforated line across the Constitution if they could get away with it.

The bho administration will fight Montana over this and lose everything.

8 posted on 08/27/2009 1:06:29 AM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
I've been saying for years. Let the States "nullify" un-Constitutional mandates. What is the Fedgov going to do if the States decide NOT to adhere to such mandates and not send their tax dollars to DC?

What would happen? Civil War II?
I believe not. It's a different time; different thinking; different feelings; different politics.

Revolutionary War II? Again,...too many differences.

Most likely the Fedgov would have to give in. Does anyone really believe that the Military, under orders of the Executive Branch, would KILL their own families in this era? This is not the 1800's - never happen.

Plus, the Governors of any rebellious States could maintain control over their State National Guard, not to mention the 100's of thousands of armed Patriots standing by. RWII will not happen as long as the States continue on this path.

I am finally encouraged for our Republic to see so many States (37?) passing resolutions regarding States' rights via the 10th Amendment. Although resolutions are non-binding, it says a lot about the current thinking of the individual States.

This is a cause we should all support! This is our way back to the Founding Fathers' brilliance for limited federal governance.

10 posted on 08/27/2009 1:14:13 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (Progressives are actually Regressive; Think Progressive Socialism Failures!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
"This is huge."

Yes, it is. This State law could be either the way back to our FF's ideals or the issue that ignites a backlash against the USSC.

I only hope the Supremes have the wisdom to negate the abused "commerce clause" and recognize States' rights regarding this issue. If not - IT'S ON!

I'm standing by. I will not end my life a subject of the United States of Socialist Republic.

14 posted on 08/27/2009 1:29:56 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (Progressives are actually Regressive; Think Progressive Socialism Failures!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Health Care Reform is another bridge to die on for Freedom’s Defenders.

The Federal Government has taken many powers unto itself it doesn’t have, through the Interstate Commerce clause and no doubt other dubious claims. So this isn’t a new phenomenon but boy is it ever picking up steam and thundering downhill like a juggernaut now.

They have no right to force me to buy an insurance product, or right to design an insurance product either in the private or public sector which I’m forced into by hook or crook, nor right to fine me through my bank account or through the IRS withholding and refusal to refund if I don’t acquiesce to their insurance schemes.

My state must defend the right of all state citizens to retain these rights granted to us by the Constitution.

Whatever it takes to defend us.


16 posted on 08/27/2009 1:36:07 AM PDT by txrangerette (Just say "no" to the Obama Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
most of these state[sic] will be among those that separate from the USA and become part of a separate Conservative nation.

Don't be ridiculous.

22 posted on 08/27/2009 1:56:43 AM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

The trouble is that this law only applies to guns in which there’s already a national market, like the farmer’s wheat from that other infamous commerce clause case, and not machine guns, in which the national market is strangled, which even the Supreme Court acknowledged.

The Feds will probably just make the same argument that they made back then - that locally-produced firearms “affect” interstate commerce in firearms by reducing sales of non-Montana firearms in Montana.

If they hadn’t excluded machine guns, they might have a better case since the interstate market in machine guns is so minimal, but at least they included silencers which fall under the same regulatory regimen as machine guns.


35 posted on 08/27/2009 2:26:03 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Movin to Monta-ana soon.....


39 posted on 08/27/2009 3:04:40 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

So, what happens once the SCOTUS shoots this down?


42 posted on 08/27/2009 3:16:40 AM PDT by wafflehouse (RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
Don't really have time to read each post, and someone may have already made this argument, but it appears to me that since the 2nd Amendment was ratified AFTER Article I, Section 8, then the “Commerce Clause” does not apply, and Congress has NO authority to regulate guns whatsoever.
48 posted on 08/27/2009 3:54:44 AM PDT by Federalist Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ForGod'sSake

More from Montana,related to 10th.


57 posted on 08/27/2009 4:56:02 AM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

This is precisely what Constitutionalists should have been doing for the last 50 years, i.e. picking apart the Federal overreach one bit at a time based strictly on clearly defined Constitutional issues.

I’m a huge 2A guy, but the rest of our state rights must also be retaken in the same type of manner. “Regulation of interstate commerce” has been used as a catch all to completely trample state’s rights. We need to get back to being a Republic of individual states.


58 posted on 08/27/2009 4:56:04 AM PDT by SampleMan (Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

59 posted on 08/27/2009 5:00:27 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
In addition, most of these state will be among those that separate from the USA and become part of a separate Conservative nation.


67 posted on 08/27/2009 5:46:26 AM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Secession yesterday, secession today, secession FOREVER! LOL.


71 posted on 08/27/2009 5:54:28 AM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

GO MONTANA!! We’ve got your back.


74 posted on 08/27/2009 6:16:20 AM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson