Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill would give president emergency control of Internet
CNET ^ | August 28, 2009 12:34 AM PDT | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 08/28/2009 8:13:33 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 521-527 next last
To: KarlInOhio

Like this Healthcare debate has a “black swan” (rare event) moment where people were able to BYPASS THE MSM.

No matter how tingly chris mathews, or how many gooball lies repeated on CNN people were able to bypass the state run media.

The politicians have freaked out.
They don’t ACTUALLY WANT TO TALK to the real voters.


141 posted on 08/28/2009 9:51:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

To: Piranha
They already are banning old toys and children's books for resale because of the use of lead-based ink

Yes, but those will be replaced with sex toys, Mommy has Two Girlfreinds and the Koran.

In the Citizens United vs FEC, they want the power to BAN political speech (by conservatives)

143 posted on 08/28/2009 9:53:14 AM PDT by GeronL (Liberalism: The gift that keeps on taking ... .. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: angkor

This highlights the arrogance of Obama and the Democrats. They *really* think they could do this. It’s so ignorant it’s funny. Can you imagine the backlash also? ...talk about “unintended consequences”. I say go ahead - try. It’d be a case of “strike me down and I’ll become more powerful than you could possibly imagine”!!! LOL


144 posted on 08/28/2009 9:53:24 AM PDT by fuzzylogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: All
Comments on this at HardOCP...see just above...#139:

Why on earth would the president ever need (legitimate) emergency control of the internet?

145 posted on 08/28/2009 9:53:33 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; All
My favorite quote:
ouch this isnt what i voted for... and will probably pass quickly as like line 5000 of the healthcare bill lol
146 posted on 08/28/2009 9:56:10 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The bill would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat.....

A “threat” like Free Republic I would imagine?


147 posted on 08/28/2009 9:56:57 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

no need to burn or outlaw books...


148 posted on 08/28/2009 9:57:36 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

this is all about silencing dissent. Nothing more. The commie is following in Hugo Chavez’s footsteps. Control the media, and prevent the opposition from being heard.


149 posted on 08/28/2009 9:57:39 AM PDT by meyer (Do not go gentle into that good night - Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

150 posted on 08/28/2009 9:58:23 AM PDT by khnyny (Barack Obama and Chauncey Gardiner: separated at birth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: murphE

No worries! This one is important!


151 posted on 08/28/2009 9:59:17 AM PDT by bamahead (Avoid self-righteousness like the devil- nothing is so self-blinding. -- B.H. Liddell Hart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

It’s almost like reading FR comments...I am surprised...


152 posted on 08/28/2009 10:00:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

The Internet was conceived very specifically and explicity to withstand a nuclear attack on America.

It can most certainly withstand an attack Zer0 and his illiterate minions.


153 posted on 08/28/2009 10:01:45 AM PDT by angkor (The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; All

Out of all Presidential Candidates in 08, he scared me the most.. Clinton, McCain I didn’t like, but I wasn’t afraid of them... But Obama I was.. With a good reason..


154 posted on 08/28/2009 10:02:52 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

155 posted on 08/28/2009 10:04:03 AM PDT by ironwill (III - Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Indeed. I’ve long envisioned a low-profile router/repeater unit for establishing an independent wi-fi grid, cheap “wall warts” that the motivated could afford en masse and plant anywhere there’s an outlet. I’ve also noted that every wireless router could be reprogrammed to do the same thing, and wish manufacturers had included that code.

Time to start...


156 posted on 08/28/2009 10:08:41 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

You fire up your browser one day, and get ... nothing. What then?


157 posted on 08/28/2009 10:10:04 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

There is no “internet” to control. The internet is the word used to describe the set of protocols and rules that must be followed in order for one computer to exchange information with another. The internet is not in one central location, and is not an object. The internet is distributed, not centralized. There is no one central organization that manages the internet.

What they really mean here is ignoring reality and principles of law and blocking/allowing access to the network for political reasons.

BBTTT.

158 posted on 08/28/2009 10:10:30 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

I don't think the Zero would take down the ENTIRE internet. The left's site's (ie. Huffington & KOS, etc) aren't his problem.

I fully expect one day to wake up and FR be down... Drudge ... Michelle Maulkin... etc... etc...

159 posted on 08/28/2009 10:11:57 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: jongaltsr

I’ve been the last 7 months.


160 posted on 08/28/2009 10:12:50 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 521-527 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson