Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change

You never denounced his words of hate.

Is it wrong to expose this hatred done in the name of Christ?

The id/creationist/ cdesign proponentsists need to see how this type of rhetoric is painting all Christians in a bad light and driving people away from the Lord.

This anti-science stance is reeking of Theocracy.


60 posted on 08/28/2009 1:48:43 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Ira_Louvin
"You never denounced his words of hate." What's this? Or do you wish to write my comments for me? "Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:42:28 AM “count-your-change to Ira_Louvin
First of all, My brothers aren't filled with hatred, don't call him my “brother”. So I have no duty or obligation to rebuke him, But he's just as wrong as the most rabid evolutionist if that's what he thinks. Of course I disagree with him, don't you?
There are all sorts of ridiculers of the Bible but I don't waste my time with them either any more than I would continue to do so here and don't after a certain point.”

You can expose anything you wish,

“Is it wrong to expose this hatred done in the name of Christ?”

but you're here griping about how someone didn't say the words you want them to.

“The id/creationist/ cdesign proponentsists need to see how this type of rhetoric is painting all Christians in a bad light and driving people away from the Lord.”

From what I've seen lately I'd lay that more to the corruption of morals by those claiming to be Christian shepherds and propagandizing of the young by the “higher” skeptics” (Darwinists, atheists, humanists, blatherists) over the years.

The creationist views have been around a long time and over the years in my discussions with folks I've found a lot of people turned off religion for a lot of reasons but not once because they heard someone's creationist's opinions.

“This anti-science stance is reeking of Theocracy.”

Anti-science or anti-Evolutionary doctrine?

Theocracy? Christians look forward to living under a Theocracy as God's Kingdom is. What future Darwinism has in that you'll have to explain to me.

64 posted on 08/28/2009 4:11:13 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Ira_Louvin; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; valkyry1; Mr. Silverback; Gordon Greene; ...
This anti-science stance is reeking of Theocracy.

Coyoteman, it is you. It is you.

Welcome back.

Long time no see.

68 posted on 08/28/2009 4:18:46 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Ira_Louvin; count-your-change

“You never denounced his words of hate”.

intreresting...so many strawmen, so little time...

has anyone seen a single FR closet liberal denounce Chrissy Fit Matthews for attacking the conservative Republican on his show, yelling and spitting at him: “the science is settled” and that little Hissy-fit is merely a great ape and anypone that doesn’t believe evolution is to be put down, a science hater....blah blah blah?

I guess this is what needs to be done when the argument is already lost, eh Ira?


82 posted on 08/28/2009 7:54:53 PM PDT by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Ira_Louvin; metmom; tpanther
This anti-science stance is reeking of Theocracy.

So, the anti-science theocracy is coming, eh? Spoken like a true leftist loon. You must be a fan of Michelle Goldberg. She's the anti-Ann Coulter who wrote Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism. Here's a review:

This book is a left-wing, ultra-liberal polemical diatribe that was written by a young woman who, while a college student at SUNY Buffalo, seems to have overdosed on Hannah Arendt's book about the rise of Nazi totalitarianism in Europe and thinks it is happening here because of the Bush Administration. She did not, apparently, take American History 101, with the result that she exhibits no knowledge or understanding about religion in American history and grossly exaggerates the importance of today's Christian fundamentalist movement in America politics. Her suggestions about what the liberal left must do politically to prevent America from becoming a Christian Nation are truly hilarious. A terrible book, disjointed, repetitive, rambling, much in need of a good editor.
Michelle Goldberg is an evolutionist too, just like you.
298 posted on 09/01/2009 4:11:28 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson